ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2023
Digital evaluation of occlusal reduction of metal crown preparations in students in the COVID-19 era: A cross-sectional study.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inter-rater reliability of global and analytic assessment of prosthodontic procedures.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Endocrown-retained fixed partial dentures: Revolutionizing tooth restoration or risky business? A finite element study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Occlusion of extra-coronal restorations depends on the reduction achieved during crown preparation. Ensuring adequate reduction is therefore essential for the success of the final restoration. The objective of this study was to digitally quantify the occlusal reduction performed by preclinical undergraduate dental students and to compare their performance across the year and using a hybrid teaching approach developed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Eighty full metal crown preparations on typodonts were scanned using the KaVo Arctica 3D Optical scanner. Occlusal reduction was measured using Autodesk Fusion 360 v2.0 by superimposing an unprepared tooth over the preparation and taking measurements at six occlusal points (mesio-buccal (MB), disto-buccal (DB), mesio-lingual (ML), disto-lingual (DL), mesial fossa (MF), and distal fossa (DF)). A general linear model was used to compare student performance in the mid vs final year exams and in 2018/19 vs 2020/2021. Results: The adequacy of occlusal reduction was variable. Occlusal reductions of the MF (p = 0.014) and DF (p = 0.011) were significantly lower in the final exam than the mid-year exam in 2018/2019. There was also occlusal under-reduction at all six occlusal points in 2020/2021 compared with 2018/2019. Conclusions: Students must be encouraged to use verification guides throughout the procedure to ensure adequate reductions. These verification methods can be as simple as putty indices or as advanced as optical scanners. The use of verification methods alongside a hybrid virtual and live teaching approach may guarantee the best results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.