ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2023
Prevalence of middle mesial canal using cone beam computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and morphometric assessment of the middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars in a turkish population: A CBCT study.Odontology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Prevalence and Morphology of Middle Mesial Canals in Bifid-Apex Mandibular Molars Using Micro-CT.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Article
- CBCT based investigation of frequency of Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular First Molars of Saudi Sub-population.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The presence of middle mesial canals in mandibular molars are not commonly encountered in daily practice. However, locating and debriding such anatomical variation during the endodontic therapy is essential to avoid endodontic failure. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the overall prevalence of middle mesial canals (MMC) in mandibular molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), to assess the influence of different gender on the prevalence of MMCs in mandibular molars and to describe the MMC configurations. Methods: The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021238523). The main electronic databases were searched until February 2022 for prevalence studies on root/canal anatomy in mandibular molars using CBCT imaging, in addition to hand-searched scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals and grey literature. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. Egger's and Begg's tests and Pearson's chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results: From 523 records, 488 studies were excluded after screening the title and abstract. 35 relevant studies were included for full-text assessment and 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of MMC out of the 19,256 teeth was 5.09% (95% CI: 2.894 to 7.784). The prevalence of MMC was 9.79% (95% CI: 4.296 to 17.224) in males and 13.96% (95% CI: 0.541 to 40.737) in females with a statistically significant difference of 4.16% (95% CI: 2.29 to 6.01). The most MMC configuration found in this review to be confluent with the mesiobuccal canal. Conclusion: The results showed an overall 5.09% prevalence of MMC in mandibular molars, with a significantly high prevalence in female subjects. Additionally, this canal was found to be confluent with the mesiobuccal canal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.