Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107015›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on affective computing

Automated Classification of Dyadic Conversation Scenarios using Autonomic Nervous System Responses.

Iman Chatterjee, Maja Goršič, Mohammad S Hossain, Joshua D Clapp, Vesna D Novak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on affective computing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regression of Multiple Conversation Aspects using Dyadic Physiological Measurements.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iman ChatterjeeUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
Maja GoršičUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
Mohammad S HossainUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
Joshua D ClappUniversity of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Vesna D NovakUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221.

Funding

Automated assessment of dyadic interaction using physiological synchrony and machine learningR03MH128633 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI NOVAK, VESNA DOMINIKA · 2022 to 2023
$151k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH128633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two people's physiological responses become more similar as those people talk or cooperate, a phenomenon called physiological synchrony. The degree of synchrony correlates with conversation engagement and cooperation quality, and could thus be used to characterize interpersonal interaction. In this study, we used a combination of physiological synchrony metrics and pattern recognition algorithms to automatically classify four different dyadic conversation scenarios: two-sided positive conversation, two-sided negative conversation, and two one-sided scenarios. Heart rate, skin conductance, respiration and peripheral skin temperature were measured from 16 dyads in all four scenarios, and individual as well as synchrony features were extracted from them. A two-stage classifier based on stepwise feature selection and linear discriminant analysis achieved a four-class classification accuracy of 75.0% in leave-dyad-out crossvalidation. Removing synchrony features reduced accuracy to 65.6%, indicating that synchrony is informative. In the future, such classification algorithms may be used to, e.g., provide real-time feedback about conversation mood to participants, with applications in areas such as mental health counseling and education. The approach may also generalize to group scenarios and adjacent areas such as cooperation and competition.

Indexed as

Affect sensing and analysisClassifier design and evaluationPeripheral measuresRecognition of group emotion

Identifiers

PMID38107015
PMCPMC10721131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.