ArticleIEEE transactions on affective computing
Automated Classification of Dyadic Conversation Scenarios using Autonomic Nervous System Responses.
Article in IEEE transactions on affective computing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated classification of conversation valence and arousal using autonomic nervous system responses.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Estimating the valence and arousal of dyadic conversations using autonomic nervous system responses and regression algorithms.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2025Article
- Regression of Multiple Conversation Aspects using Dyadic Physiological Measurements.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024Article
- Strain FBG-Based Sensor for Detecting Fence Intruders Using Machine Learning and Adaptive Thresholding.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automated Classification of Dyadic Conversation Scenarios using Autonomic Nervous System Responses.IEEE transactions on affective computingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two people's physiological responses become more similar as those people talk or cooperate, a phenomenon called physiological synchrony. The degree of synchrony correlates with conversation engagement and cooperation quality, and could thus be used to characterize interpersonal interaction. In this study, we used a combination of physiological synchrony metrics and pattern recognition algorithms to automatically classify four different dyadic conversation scenarios: two-sided positive conversation, two-sided negative conversation, and two one-sided scenarios. Heart rate, skin conductance, respiration and peripheral skin temperature were measured from 16 dyads in all four scenarios, and individual as well as synchrony features were extracted from them. A two-stage classifier based on stepwise feature selection and linear discriminant analysis achieved a four-class classification accuracy of 75.0% in leave-dyad-out crossvalidation. Removing synchrony features reduced accuracy to 65.6%, indicating that synchrony is informative. In the future, such classification algorithms may be used to, e.g., provide real-time feedback about conversation mood to participants, with applications in areas such as mental health counseling and education. The approach may also generalize to group scenarios and adjacent areas such as cooperation and competition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.