Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106981›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023

Cultivation of human centered artificial intelligence: culturally adaptive thinking in education (CATE) for AI.

Yana Samuel, Margaret Brennan-Tonetta, Jim Samuel, Rajiv Kashyap, Vivek Kumar, Sri Krishna Kaashyap, Nishitha Chidipothu, Irawati Anand, Parth Jain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Climate-control ChatGPT for EFL writing and AI literacy.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yana SamuelMiddlesex County College, Edison, NJ, United States.
Margaret Brennan-TonettaRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Jim SamuelRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Rajiv KashyapWilliam Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, United States.
Vivek KumarUniversity of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.
Sri Krishna KaashyapRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Nishitha ChidipothuRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Irawati AnandRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Parth JainRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USMiddlesex County College · USUniversity of Cagliari · ITWilliam Paterson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become ubiquitous in human society, and yet vast segments of the global population have no, little, or counterproductive information about AI. It is necessary to teach AI topics on a mass scale. While there is a rush to implement academic initiatives, scant attention has been paid to the unique challenges of teaching AI curricula to a global and culturally diverse audience with varying expectations of privacy, technological autonomy, risk preference, and knowledge sharing. Our study fills this void by focusing on AI elements in a new framework titled Culturally Adaptive Thinking in Education for AI (CATE-AI) to enable teaching AI concepts to culturally diverse learners. Failure to contextualize and sensitize AI education to culture and other categorical human-thought clusters, can lead to several undesirable effects including confusion, AI-phobia, cultural biases to AI, increased resistance toward AI technologies and AI education. We discuss and integrate human behavior theories, AI applications research, educational frameworks, and human centered AI principles to articulate CATE-AI. In the first part of this paper, we present the development a significantly enhanced version of CATE. In the second part, we explore textual data from AI related news articles to generate insights that lay the foundation for CATE-AI, and support our findings. The CATE-AI framework can help learners study artificial intelligence topics more effectively by serving as a basis for adapting and contextualizing AI to their sociocultural needs.

Indexed as

AIAI educationAI philosophyculturally responsive teachingcultureeducationeducational AIhuman centered artificial intelligence

Identifiers

PMID38106981
PMCPMC10722251
OpenAlexW4389235433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.