Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106966›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2023

Debiased lasso for stratified Cox models with application to the national kidney transplant data.

Lu Xia, Bin Nan, Yi Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lu XiaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington.
Bin NanDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine.
Yi LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan.
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The Boston Lung Cancer Survival CohortU01CA209414 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI David C Christiani · 2017 to 2026
$12.2M
New Statistical Methods for Modelling Cancer OutcomesR01CA249096 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yi Li · 2021 to 2026
$2.5M
Statistical Methods for Alzheimer's ResearchRF1AG075107 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GILLEN, DANIEL L, NAN, BIN · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
Detecting racial disparities in cancer survival by integrating multiple high-dimensional observational studiesR01CA269398 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GUHA, SUBHARUP, LI, YI · 2022 to 2025
$1.3M
Cutting Edge Survival Methods for Epidemiological DataR01AG056764 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI NAN, BIN · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249096NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269398NCI NIH HHS U01 CA209414NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056764NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG075107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) system has become a rich resource for understanding the complex mechanisms of graft failure after kidney transplant, a crucial step for allocating organs effectively and implementing appropriate care. As transplant centers that treated patients might strongly confound graft failures, Cox models stratified by centers can eliminate their confounding effects. Also, since recipient age is a proven non-modifiable risk factor, a common practice is to fit models separately by recipient age groups. The moderate sample sizes, relative to the number of covariates, in some age groups may lead to biased maximum stratified partial likelihood estimates and unreliable confidence intervals even when samples still outnumber covariates. To draw reliable inference on a comprehensive list of risk factors measured from both donors and recipients in SRTR, we propose a de-biased lasso approach via quadratic programming for fitting stratified Cox models. We establish asymptotic properties and verify via simulations that our method produces consistent estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage probabilities. Accounting for nearly 100 confounders in SRTR, the de-biased method detects that the graft failure hazard nonlinearly increases with donor's age among all recipient age groups, and that organs from older donors more adversely impact the younger recipients. Our method also delineates the associations between graft failure and many risk factors such as recipients' primary diagnoses (e.g. polycystic disease, glomerular disease, and diabetes) and donor-recipient mismatches for human leukocyte antigen loci across recipient age groups. These results may inform the refinement of donor-recipient matching criteria for stakeholders.

Indexed as

Confidence intervalsdiverging number of covariatesend-stage renal diseasegraft failure free survivalstatistical inference

Identifiers

PMID38106966
PMCPMC10720921
OpenAlexW4388088888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.