ArticleCureus2023
Morphometric Evaluation of Human Placental and Umbilical Cord for Neonatal Indices: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Placental and umbilical cord morphometry in preeclampsia and their association with neonatal outcomes: a preliminary study in Ghana.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Fetal vascular malperfusion and other placental lesions in relation to maternal SARS-CoV-2 exposure: a case-control study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in human placenta: insights into fetal growth restriction and congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn India, there is only limited data on studies related to umbilical cord and placental indices in newborn infants. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the morphometric analysis of placental and umbilical cord indices and their association with length, weight, and head size in newborns. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a longitudinal cross-sectional study conducted on placentas and fetal measures from 245 women who gave birth during the study period. The placental variables, umbilical cord indices, and neonatal indices were measured. The association between the parameters was done using Pearson's correlation, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The placental weight (p=0.01) and placental volume (p=0.01) showed a significant positive correlation with newborn weight. The mean placental diameter was 16.32 ± 1.54 cm, and there was no significant correlation between placental diameter and infant weight (p=0.232), length (p=0.658), or head circumference (0.842). In addition, there was a significant association between placental diameter, placental volume (p=0.000), and placental weight (p=0.000). There was a significant positive correlation (p<0.05) between ponderable index and birth weight, length, and head circumference.
conclusionPlacental weight and newborn weight were significantly associated in this study. The length of the umbilical cord was found to be related to placental weight. So, placental measurements are reliable indicators for the assessment of fetal wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.