Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106762›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Retrospective Observational Study on the Comparison of Different Diagnostic Modalities of Post-COVID Mucormycosis.

Guddi Rani Singh, Shabana Azad, Mamta Kumari, Sweta Kumari, Sanjiv Kumar, Ausaf Ahmed

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guddi Rani SinghPathology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Shabana AzadPathology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, IND.
Mamta KumariPathology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Sweta KumariBiochemistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Sanjiv KumarMicrobiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Ausaf AhmedSurgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Bhabha Hospital · INIndira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences · INCancer Hospital and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Mucormycosis, attributed to a group of molds known as mucormycosis, is a rare yet life-threatening fungal infection often colloquially referred to as black fungus. While its incidence notably surged during the second wave of COVID-19 infections in India, it's essential to recognize that mucormycosis was a significant concern even before the advent of the pandemic. Understanding the prevalence and characteristics of this infection in the pre-COVID era provides a crucial context for evaluating its impact and dynamics during the pandemic. Multiple diagnostic methods, such as potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount, culture, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and histopathological examination (HPE), are available for identifying this lethal infection. The primary objective of this study is to ascertain the sensitivity of various diagnostic methods for mucormycosis and to analyze the comparative effectiveness of microbiological versus histopathological diagnoses. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study spanning six months, from May 2021 to October 2021, encompassing all mucormycosis cases meeting the inclusion criteria and diagnosed via histopathological examination (HPE) in the departments of pathology and microbiology. Microbiological tests were performed prior to the histopathological examinations. Sensitivity was assessed through statistical analysis, and the relationship between microbiological and histopathological diagnoses was evaluated using the chi-square test. Results Biopsy samples of 77 patients were collected, comprising 56 male and 21 female patients. Regarding age distribution, most patients fell within the 41-60 age bracket, while the smallest proportion was over 60 years old. The sensitivity and specificity of histopathological diagnosis, confirmed with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and Grocott-Gomori's methenamine silver (GMS) staining, both recorded a flawless 100%. KOH mount sensitivity stood at 88.3%, while fungal culture and MALDI-TOF exhibited sensitivities of 75.3%. Histopathological analysis revealed that 17% of cases displayed minimal fungal hyphae alongside necrotic tissue, whereas 58% exhibited abundant fungal hyphae accompanied by inflammatory cells. Additionally, absolute neutrophilia was observed in 55% of cases. Conclusions In our study, histopathology and KOH mount emerged as not only compassionate but also cost-effective diagnostic tools for identifying mucormycosis. The economic aspect of these diagnostic methods is highlighted in the results section to provide a comprehensive understanding of their cost-effectiveness. Additionally, we utilized MALDI-TOF MS as a straightforward, economically viable, and expeditious method specifically for confirming the fungal subtype in mucormycosis cases. The rationale behind choosing either MALDI-TOF MS or KOH for the diagnosis is elucidated, contributing to a clearer interpretation of our diagnostic approach. Furthermore, our findings indicate that absolute neutrophilia consistently manifests in 55% of mucormycosis cases.

Indexed as

diagnosisfungal infectionhistopathologymaldi-tofmucormycosissensitivity

Identifiers

PMID38106762
PMCPMC10725520
OpenAlexW4388774493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.