Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106711›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Experimental Analysis of the Efficiency and Usability of Tylke Versus Magill Forceps.

Norris C Talbot, Patrick M Luther, Noah J Spillers, Steven J Alexander, Arthur J Saus, George M Jeha, Laine N Rogers, Giustino Varrassi, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Norris C TalbotSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Patrick M LutherSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Noah J SpillersSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Steven J AlexanderPhysiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Arthur J SausAnesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
George M JehaSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, USA.
Laine N RogersSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Giustino VarrassiPain Medicine, Paolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, ITA.
Shahab AhmadzadehAnesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Sahar ShekoohiAnesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Elyse M CornettAnesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Alan D KayeAnesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USFondazione Roma · ITLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe procedure of nasotracheal intubation (NI) has long been performed utilizing the Magill forceps as developed by Sir Ivan Magill in the 1920s. While used for nearly a century, several serious patient safety concerns remain including torn tube cuffs, vocal cord trauma, and inefficient tube placement. The Tylke forceps have been developed as a modification to the largely unchanged form of Magill forceps.

methodsIn the present investigation we compared the efficacy, number of clasps, and muscle activation involved in NI using the Tylke forceps versus the Magill forceps in previously untrained individuals.

resultsTylke forceps showed faster successful NI over the standard Magill forceps at an average intubation time of 6.54s vs. 13.73s, respectively. Tylke forceps also had fewer clasps per intubation over the Magill. The trapezius, deltoid, and brachioradialis muscle activation was also compared in Tylke vs Magill forceps intubation trials. Tylke forceps required less lower muscle activation in the brachioradialis and trapezius over the Magill forceps with Tylke forceps resulting in higher deltoid muscle activation.

conclusionTylke forceps were more efficacious and reduced the number of clasps over the Magill forceps when used in successful NI with different muscle activation patterns.

Indexed as

brachioradialisdeltoidmagill forcepsnasal intubationnasotracheal intubationtrapeziustylke forceps

Identifiers

PMID38106711
PMCPMC10722340
OpenAlexW4388692420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.