Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106705›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation Throughout the Day.

Veronica Noya-Padin, Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga, Belen Sabucedo-Villamarin, Noelia Nores-Palmas, Ricardo Taboada-Mecias, Eva Yebra-Pimentel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronica Noya-PadinDepartment of Applied Physics (Optometry Area), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, ESP.
Jacobo Garcia-QueirugaDepartment of Applied Physics (Optometry Area), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, ESP.
Belen Sabucedo-VillamarinDepartment of Applied Physics (Optometry Area), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, ESP.
Noelia Nores-PalmasDepartment of Applied Physics (Optometry Area), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, ESP.
Ricardo Taboada-MeciasDepartment of Applied Physics (Optometry Area), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, ESP.
Eva Yebra-PimentelDepartment of Applied Physics (Optometry Area), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, ESP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) values at different time points, both in the total sample and according to iridocorneal angle aperture, to assess whether IOP fluctuations were constant throughout the day, and to examine correlations with other factors. Methods Over a single day, the IOP of 34 volunteers was measured at three-hour intervals from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. To avoid any IOP value being affected by other measurements, anamnesis, slit-lamp evaluation (with iridocorneal angle measurement), and refractive status were performed after the final measurement. The differences between IOP values at different time points and IOP fluctuation at three-hour intervals were compared by ANOVA and Friedman test, respectively, both for the total group and according to iridocorneal angle aperture. For relationships, Pearson's correlation was performed for parametric variables and Spearman's correlation for nonparametric variables. Results Significant differences were observed in IOP between time points for the total sample (p < 0.001), but not for a narrow-angle group (p = 0.058). No significant differences were found in IOP fluctuations at three-hour intervals either in the total sample or according to angle aperture (all p ≥ 0.332). There was a positive correlation of IOP at different time points (all r ≥ 0.646, all p < 0.001) but no relationship with spherical equivalent, age, or sleep duration (all p ≥ 0.057). IOP at 12:00 p.m. was correlated with a 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. fluctuation (r = 0.428, p = 0.012); and IOP fluctuation between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. was correlated with age (r = 0.485, p = 0.004). Conclusion As IOP decreases from morning until at least 6:00 p.m., measuring these two values during clinical evaluation is essential for the effective monitoring and prevention of IOP-related diseases.

Indexed as

canon tx-10glaucoma risk factorsintraocular pressureintraocular pressure fluctuationocular risk factors

Identifiers

PMID38106705
PMCPMC10722343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.