ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2023
Novel laser therapies and new technologies in the endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Outcomes of Primary Chemoablation of Low-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma With UGN-101, a Mitomycin Reverse Thermal Gel.The Journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Review
- Management and Treatment Strategies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Review
- Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Local Ablation Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease. The gold standard treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Endoscopic management of UTUC has emerged as an alternative therapy that aims to preserve kidney function while providing effective oncologic control. Over the years, this has become an increasingly important alternative to RNU for treating UTUC in patients with localized disease. Advancements in lasers and endoscopic technology have continued to expand the applications of endoscopic nephron-sparing treatment. This review aims to provide an overview of the available lasers and ureteroscopic technologies used in treating UTUC with a focus on their clinical applications and outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was completed using PubMed to create this narrative mini review. Publications from peer-reviewed journals written in English between 1987 to 2022 were evaluated by the authors for inclusion. Key Content and Findings: Improvements in ureteroscopic technology have led to improved visualization and tumor detection. Laser ablation using different laser energies including the holmium/yttrium-aluminum-garnet, neodymium/YAG, and thulium/YAG has demonstrated promising oncologic outcomes. However, accurate staging and risk-stratification remain limitations to the role of laser ablation for the treatment of UTUC. This review also highlights appropriate patient selection as a critical component of successful endoscopic management. Conclusions: The continued evolution of endoscopic management will rely on the development of new technologies to improve risk stratification and oncologic outcomes. Overall, this review provides insights into the available laser therapies and ureteroscopic technologies for the endoscopic management of UTUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.