Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106674›Full record

ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2023

Microphysiological systems for solid tumor immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges.

Sara Abizanda-Campo, María Virumbrales-Muñoz, Mouhita Humayun, Ines Marmol, David J Beebe, Ignacio Ochoa, Sara Oliván, Jose M Ayuso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mechano-Organ-on-Chip for Cancer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Immunotherapy for Solid Tumours: Current Clinical Landscape and Future Directions.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Combination Image-Guided and Antibody-Targeted α-Therapy Before Targeted Immunotherapy for Treatment of Solid Tumors.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Nanomedicines for Potentiating Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Engineering in vitro vascular microsystems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara Abizanda-CampoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
María Virumbrales-MuñozUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3660-8651
Mouhita HumayunDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Cambridge, MA USA.
Ines MarmolTissue Microenvironment Lab (TME lab), Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3136-2480
David J BeebeUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0415-9006
Ignacio OchoaTissue Microenvironment Lab (TME lab), Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Sara Oliván *Tissue Microenvironment Lab (TME lab), Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jose M Ayuso *Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-1845

Funding

Targeting cancer-stroma interactions in breast cancer metastasis using organotypic modelingF31CA247248 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HUMAYUN, MOUHITA · 2019 to 2021
$67k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA247248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy remains more effective for hematologic tumors than for solid tumors. One of the main challenges to immunotherapy of solid tumors is the immunosuppressive microenvironment these tumors generate, which limits the cytotoxic capabilities of immune effector cells (e.g., cytotoxic T and natural killer cells). This microenvironment is characterized by hypoxia, nutrient starvation, accumulated waste products, and acidic pH. Tumor-hijacked cells, such as fibroblasts, macrophages, and T regulatory cells, also contribute to this inhospitable microenvironment for immune cells by secreting immunosuppressive cytokines that suppress the antitumor immune response and lead to immune evasion. Thus, there is a strong interest in developing new drugs and cell formulations that modulate the tumor microenvironment and reduce tumor cell immune evasion. Microphysiological systems (MPSs) are versatile tools that may accelerate the development and evaluation of these therapies, although specific examples showcasing the potential of MPSs remain rare. Advances in microtechnologies have led to the development of sophisticated microfluidic devices used to recapitulate tumor complexity. The resulting models, also known as microphysiological systems (MPSs), are versatile tools with which to decipher the molecular mechanisms driving immune cell antitumor cytotoxicity, immune cell exhaustion, and immune cell exclusion and to evaluate new targeted immunotherapies. Here, we review existing microphysiological platforms to study immuno-oncological applications and discuss challenges and opportunities in the field.

Indexed as

EngineeringNanofluidics

Identifiers

PMID38106674
PMCPMC10724276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.