ReviewKidney international reports2023
Evaluating Progression Risk in Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.
Review in Kidney international reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction in IgA nephropathy: from conventional models to machine learning, deep learning, and precision nephrology.Renal failure · 2026Review
- Large language models decode narrative pathology reports to define clinically relevant subtypes in IgA nephropathy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- New prognostic markers for IgA nephropathy in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Microscopic hematuria in IgA nephropathy: a biomarker of disease activity.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Nephron Number and Kidney Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Kidney360 · 2026Article
- Research progress on the lectin pathway of complement in IgA nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Treatment of recurrent IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation with targeted-release budesonide - a case report.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Treating IgA Nephropathy: Looking at the Future Without Forgetting the Past.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Urine complement-related proteins in IgA nephropathy and IgA vasculitis nephritis, possible biomarkers of disease activity.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- The proteinuria selectivity index value predicts the remission of IgA nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Article
- Healthcare of patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy through a retrospective observational study of Italian administrative data.Global & regional health technology assessmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The highly variable rate of decline in kidney function in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) provides a major clinical challenge. Predicting which patients will progress to kidney failure, and how quickly, is difficult. Multiple novel therapies are likely to be approved in the short-term, but clinicians lack the tools to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific treatments at the right time. Noninvasive and validated markers for selecting at-risk patients and longitudinal monitoring are urgently needed. This review summarizes what is known about demographic, clinical, and histopathologic prognostic markers in the clinician's toolkit, including the International IgAN Prediction Tool. We also briefly review what is known on these topics in children and adolescents with IgAN. Although helpful, currently used markers leave clinicians heavily reliant on histologic features from the diagnostic kidney biopsy and standard clinical data to guide treatment choice, and very few noninvasive markers reflect treatment efficacy over time. Novel prognostic and predictive markers are under clinical investigation, with considerable progress being made in markers of complement activation. Other areas of research are the interplay between gut microbiota and galactose-deficient IgA1 expression; microRNAs; imaging; artificial intelligence; and markers of fibrosis. Given the rate of therapeutic advancement, the remaining gaps in biomarker research need to be addressed. We finish by describing our route to clinical utility of predictive and prognostic markers in IgAN. This route will provide us with the chance to improve IgAN prognosis by using robust, clinically practical markers to inform patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.