ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Identification and risk stratification of coronary disease by artificial intelligence-enabled ECG.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Electrocardiography for the Detection of Heart Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI literacy in healthcare organisations: implementing article 4 of the EU AI Act with M-SHALF.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular disease prevention in China: challenges and opportunities in the artificial intelligence-enabled digital health era.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The role of artificial intelligence in early detection and risk prediction of ischemic heart disease.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- From Exposure to Atherosclerosis: Mechanistic Insights into Phthalate-Driven Ischemic Heart Disease and Prevention Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictive value of combined electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established coronary artery disease: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography from scientific research to clinical application.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Real-world application of deep learning for ECG-based prediction of coronary artery disease and revascularization needs.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Pre-trained Artificial Intelligence Models in the Prediction and Classification of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Transforming Population Health Screening for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease with AI-Enhanced ECG Analytics: Opportunities and Challenges.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Association Between ECG Findings and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk Score: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ischemic Heart Disease Prevention.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence estimated electrocardiographic age as a recurrence predictor after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Health Inequities in Dietary Interventions on Atherosclerosis: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Is it Ready for Prime Time?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Future Horizons: The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, driven primarily by coronary artery disease (CAD). ASCVD risk estimators such as the pooled cohort equations (PCE) facilitate risk stratification and primary prevention of ASCVD but their accuracy is still suboptimal. Methods: Using deep electronic health record data from 7,116,209 patients seen at 70+ hospitals and clinics across 5 states in the USA, we developed an artificial intelligence-based electrocardiogram analysis tool (ECG-AI) to detect CAD and assessed the additive value of ECG-AI-based ASCVD risk stratification to the PCE. We created independent ECG-AI models using separate neural networks including subjects without known history of ASCVD, to identify coronary artery calcium (CAC) score ≥300 Agatston units by computed tomography, obstructive CAD by angiography or procedural intervention, and regional left ventricular akinesis in ≥1 segment by echocardiogram, as a reflection of possible prior myocardial infarction (MI). These were used to assess the utility of ECG-AI-based ASCVD risk stratification in a retrospective observational study consisting of patients with PCE scores and no prior ASCVD. The study period covered all available digitized EHR data, with the first available ECG in 1987 and the last in February 2023. Findings: ECG-AI for identifying CAC ≥300, obstructive CAD, and regional akinesis achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) values of 0.88, 0.85, and 0.94, respectively. An ensembled ECG-AI identified 3, 5, and 10-year risk for acute coronary events and mortality independently and additively to PCE. Hazard ratios for acute coronary events over 3-years in patients without ASCVD that tested positive on 1, 2, or 3 versus 0 disease-specific ECG-AI models at cohort entry were 2.41 (2.14-2.71), 4.23 (3.74-4.78), and 11.75 (10.2-13.52), respectively. Similar stratification was observed in cohorts stratified by PCE or age. Interpretation: ECG-AI has potential to address unmet need for accessible risk stratification in patients in whom PCE under, over, or insufficiently estimates ASCVD risk, and in whom risk assessment over time periods shorter than 10 years is desired. Funding: Anumana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.