Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106557›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2023

The effect of adverse childhood experience training, screening, and response in primary care: a systematic review.

Ryan K McBain, Jonathan S Levin, Samantha Matthews, Nabeel Qureshi, Dayna Long, Adam B Schickedanz, Rachel Gilgoff, Krista Kotz, George M Slavich, Nicole K Eberhart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Maternal childhood adversity accelerates epigenetic aging of children.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Estimating the Prevalence of Child Abuse and Neglect Among Adolescents in Primary Care Through Diagnoses Codes and Free-Text EHR Clinical Notes.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryan K McBainDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan S LevinDivision of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Washington, DC, USA.
Samantha MatthewsDivision of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Nabeel QureshiDivision of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Dayna LongDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Adam B SchickedanzDepartment of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rachel GilgoffUCLA-UCSF ACEs Aware Family Resilience Network, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Krista KotzUCLA-UCSF ACEs Aware Family Resilience Network, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
George M SlavichDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nicole K EberhartDivision of Healthcare Delivery, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

Effectiveness & Implementation of Medical-Financial Partnerships for Parent Health-Related Quality of Life and Child Developmental RiskK23HD099308 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SCHICKEDANZ, ADAM · 2019 to 2023
$885k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD099308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can have harmful, long-term health effects. Although primary care providers (PCPs) could help mitigate these effects, no studies have reviewed the impacts of ACE training, screening, and response in primary care. Methods: This systematic review searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL) for peer-reviewed articles on ACE training, screening, and/or response in primary care published between Jan 1, 1998, and May 31, 2023. Searches were limited to primary research articles in the primary care setting that reported provider-related outcomes (knowledge, confidence, screening behavior, clinical care) and/or patient-related outcomes (satisfaction, referral engagement, health outcomes). Summary data were extracted from published reports. Findings: Of 6532 records, 58 met inclusion criteria. Fifty-two reported provider-related outcomes; 21 reported patient-related outcomes. 50 included pediatric populations, 12 included adults. A majority discussed screening interventions (n = 40). Equal numbers (n = 25) discussed training and clinical response interventions. Strength of evidence (SOE) was generally low, especially for adult studies. This was due to reliance on observational evidence, small samples, and self-report measures for heterogeneous outcomes. Exceptions with moderate SOE included the effect of training interventions on provider confidence/self-efficacy and the effect of screening interventions on screening uptake and patient satisfaction. Interpretation: Primary care represents a potentially strategic setting for addressing ACEs, but evidence on patient- and provider-related outcomes remains scarce. Funding: The California Department of Health Care Services and the Office of the California Surgeon General.

Indexed as

Adverse childhood experiencesLife stressorsPediatricsPrimary careTraumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID38106557
PMCPMC10725064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.