Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106556›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Development and validation of CT-based radiomics deep learning signatures to predict lymph node metastasis in non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a multicohort study.

Wenchao Gu, Yingli Chen, Haibin Zhu, Haidi Chen, Zongcheng Yang, Shaocong Mo, Hongyue Zhao, Lei Chen, Takahito Nakajima, XianJun Yu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multimodal Nomogram for the Prenatal Risk Assessment of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Using Self-Supervised Learning.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric and Gynecological MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenchao GuDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Ibaraki, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yingli ChenDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Haibin ZhuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Haidi ChenDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zongcheng YangDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, PR China.
Shaocong MoDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongyue ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Radiology, Minhang Branch, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Takahito NakajimaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Ibaraki, Tsukuba, Japan.
XianJun YuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shunrong JiDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
YaJia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei TangDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNUniversity of Tsukuba · JPFudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNHarbin Medical University · CNPeking University · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymph node status is an important factor for the patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) with respect to the surgical methods, prognosis, recurrence. Our aim is to develop and validate a combination model based on contrast-enhanced CT images to predict the lymph node metastasis (LNM) in NF-PanNETs. Methods: Retrospective data were gathered for 320 patients with NF-PanNETs who underwent curative pancreatic resection and CT imaging at two institutions (Center 1, n = 236 and Center 2, n = 84) between January 2010 and March 2022. RDPs (Radiomics deep learning signature) were developed based on ten machine-learning techniques. These signatures were integrated with the clinicopathological factors into a nomogram for clinical applications. The evaluation of the model's performance was conducted through the metrics of the area under the curve (AUC). Findings: The RDPs showed excellent performance in both centers with a high AUC for predicting LNM and disease-free survival (DFS) in Center 1 (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84-0.92; DFS, p < 0.05) and Center 2 (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85-0.97; DFS, p < 0.05). The clinical factors of vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor grade were associated with LNM (p < 0.05). The combination nomogram showed better prediction capability for LNM (AUC, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.96). Notably, our model maintained a satisfactory predictive ability for tumors at the 2-cm threshold, demonstrating its effectiveness across different tumor sizes in Center 1 (≤2 cm: AUC, 0.90 and >2 cm: AUC, 0.86) and Center 2 (≤2 cm: AUC, 0.93 and >2 cm: AUC, 0.91). Interpretation: Our RDPs may have the potential to preoperatively predict LNM in NF-PanNETs, address the insufficiency of clinical guidelines concerning the 2-cm threshold for tumor lymph node dissection, and provide precise therapeutic strategies. Funding: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K20814; the Rare Tumor Research Special Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82141104) and Clinical Research Special Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (202340123).

Indexed as

CTDeep learningLymph node metastasisNon-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38106556
PMCPMC10725026
OpenAlexW4387894194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.