Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106555›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Efficacy and safety of zapnometinib in hospitalised adult patients with COVID-19 (RESPIRE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial.

Gernot Rohde, Stephan Stenglein, Hans Prozesky, Ganesh Manudhane, Oana Sandulescu, Martin Bauer, Tim Overend, Winfried Koch, Dennis Neuschwander, Oliver Planz and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04776044 (RESPIRE - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ATR-002 in Adult Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04776044 phase2terminatednot on this map

RESPIRE - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ATR-002 in Adult Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtriva Therapeutics GmbHRan2021 to 2022Enrolled133ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsATR-002, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The ribosomal landscape in influenza A virus infection: from molecular mechanisms to clinical relevance.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Gernot RohdeGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic I, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Stephan StengleinAtriva Therapeutics GmbH, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans ProzeskyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and TREAD Research, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ganesh ManudhaneSeven Hills Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Oana SandulescuNational Institute for Infectious Diseases "Prof. Dr. Matei Bals", Bucharest, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Martin BauerAtriva Therapeutics GmbH, Tübingen, Germany.
Tim OverendAtriva Therapeutics GmbH, Tübingen, Germany.
Winfried KochBDS Koch, Schwetzingen, Germany.
Dennis NeuschwanderDepartment of Biostatistics, GCP-Service International Ltd. & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany.
Oliver PlanzEberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
Antoni TorresHospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Biomedical Research Networking Centers in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Martin WitzenrathDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Berlin, Germany.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROGerman Center for Lung Research · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESSchwetzingen Technical Institute & Graduate Court Registrars' College · DEStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Zapnometinib is an oral, non-ATP-competitive, small-molecule inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2 with immunomodulatory and antiviral properties. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of zapnometinib in patients with COVID-19. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial, we recruited hospitalised adults with moderate or severe COVID-19 from 18 hospitals in Germany, India, Romania, South Africa, and Spain. Those requiring ICU admission or ventilator support at screening or randomisation were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral zapnometinib (900 mg on Day 1; 600 mg on Days 2-6) or matching placebo, on top of standard of care. Randomisation, stratified by baseline clinical severity status (CSS 3 or 4, measured on a 7-point ordinal scale), was done using Interactive Response Technology. Patients, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was CSS at Day 15 and was conducted on the full analysis set (FAS: all patients who were randomised to the study, received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-dose assessment of CSS, as randomised). Safety analyses were conducted on the safety analysis set (all study participants who received at least one dose of study medication, as treated). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04776044) and EudraCT (2020-004206-59). Findings: The trial was terminated early as the emergence of the Omicron variant impacted recruitment. Between 12th April 2021 and 9th August 2022, 104 of the planned 220 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 103 were treated, and 101 were included in the FAS (zapnometinib: n = 50; placebo: n = 51). The primary outcome was not significantly different between the two groups, but patients on zapnometinib had higher odds of improved CSS versus placebo (odds ratio [OR] 1.54 [95% CI 0.72-3.33]; p = 0.26). Predefined subgroup analyses identified trends for improved CSS in patients with severe disease at baseline (OR 2.57 [0.76-8.88]; p = 0.13) and non-Omicron variants (OR 2.36 [0.85-6.71]; p = 0.10); the p value of the CSS subgroup by Treatment interaction term in the model was p = 0.28. The frequency and intensity of adverse events was low and similar between arms. Twenty (39.2%) patients treated with zapnometinib experienced adverse events compared with eighteen (34.6%) patients treated with placebo. One patient receiving zapnometinib and two patients receiving placebo died during the study. None of the deaths were considered related to study medication. Interpretation: These results provide proof-of-concept for the innovative approach of targeting the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in patients with hospitalised moderate/severe COVID-19. Further clinical studies will be required to evaluate the clinical benefit of zapnometinib in this and other indications. Funding: Atriva Therapeutics GmbH and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany.

Indexed as

Anti-viralCOVID-19Immunomodulator

Identifiers

PMID38106555
PMCPMC10725048
OpenAlexW4387340043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.