ArticleApplications in plant sciences
A comparison of methods for excluding light from stems to evaluate stem photosynthesis.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing the carbon starvation hypothesis using a late-successional neotropical tree species with green photosynthetic stems.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Beyond the leaves: functional role of chlorophyllous stems in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and their impact on nitrogen balance and root development.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Does green stem photosynthesis affect plant drought tolerance and recovery in avocado?AoB PLANTS · 2025Article
- The benefits of woody plant stem photosynthesis extend to hydraulic function and drought survival in Parkinsonia florida.Tree physiology · 2024Article
- A comparison of methods for excluding light from stems to evaluate stem photosynthesis.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: A comparison of methods using different materials to exclude light from stems to prevent stem CO Methods and Results: The experiment featured three materials: aluminum foil, paper-based wrap, and mineral-based paint. We examined stem CO Conclusions: Methods used to study stem CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.