ArticleArXiv2023
Disentangling Fact from Grid Cell Fiction in Trained Deep Path Integrators.
Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Work on deep learning-based models of grid cells suggests that grid cells generically and robustly arise from optimizing networks to path integrate, i.e., track one's spatial position by integrating self-velocity signals. In previous work [27], we challenged this path integration hypothesis by showing that deep neural networks trained to path integrate almost always do so, but almost never learn grid-like tuning unless separately inserted by researchers via mechanisms unrelated to path integration. In this work, we restate the key evidence substantiating these insights, then address a response to [27] by authors of one of the path integration hypothesis papers [32]. First, we show that the response misinterprets our work, indirectly confirming our points. Second, we evaluate the response's preferred "unified theory for the origin of grid cells" in trained deep path integrators [31, 33, 34] and show that it is at best "occasionally suggestive," not exact or comprehensive. We finish by considering why assessing model quality through prediction of biological neural activity by regression of activity in deep networks [23] can lead to the wrong conclusions.
Identifiers
38106458PMC10723537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.