Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106364›Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2023

Educational Interventions in Immigrants for Asthma and COPD: A Systematic Review.

Malath Al-Juhaishi, Chiao Xin Lim, Vincent Chan, Ieva Stupans, Thilini R Thrimawithana

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malath Al-JuhaishiDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0712-6696
Chiao Xin LimDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5543-8411
Vincent ChanDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5536-1565
Ieva StupansDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8193-6905
Thilini R ThrimawithanaDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3100-7187
RMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Asthma and COPD are prevalent respiratory conditions among immigrants, yet many individuals in this population do not effectively utilize available therapies, resulting in exacerbations and limitations in their daily lives. This systematic review seeks to describe asthma/COPD educational interventions specifically tailored for immigrant patients and assess their variability and outcomes, with the ultimate goal of improving self-management and achieving better asthma or COPD control in this population. Design: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using four electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Embase and PsycInfo). Articles were included if they focused on asthma or COPD interventions conducted in immigrant populations. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included articles. Results: Out of the initial 1173 articles identified, 812 were assessed for eligibility. Six articles met the inclusion criteria for educational interventions targeting immigrants with asthma or COPD. These studies explored the effectiveness of interventions on various immigrant populations using different methodologies including group discussion of photographs and classroom-based interventions. The interventions varied in terms of settings, educational materials, and delivery methods. Positive outcomes were observed in areas such as knowledge, understanding of instructions, and inhaler technique. However, the included studies had limitations in assessing the impact on asthma and COPD self-management and sustainability. Conclusion: More research is needed on asthma and COPD management in immigrants. The interventions included in this review had positive effects on outcomes like inhaler technique and asthma knowledge. However, due to variability in outcome measures, it is difficult to directly compare the interventions. Future studies should include diverse immigrant populations, consider the specific migration status of the immigrants, long-term sustainability of the intervention and use culturally tailored approaches to improve respiratory health in this population.

Indexed as

asthmaasylum seekersCOPDimmigrantsinterventionrefugeesself-care

Identifiers

PMID38106364
PMCPMC10723191
OpenAlexW4389569253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.