ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2023
Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Using Machine Learning.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Acute kidney injury incidence and mortality following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction Models for Acute Kidney Injury in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after intracerebral hemorrhage: Comparison of multiple model approaches.Medicine · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning Method for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- Article
- Acute kidney injury after intracerebral hemorrhage: a mini review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Epidemiology and Outcome of Early Acute Kidney Injuries in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Admitted to the Apex Neurosciences Center in Dubai.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is prevalent in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and is associated with mortality. This study aimed to verify the predictive accuracy of different machine learning algorithms for AKI in patients with ICH using a large dataset. Methods: A total of 1366 ICH patients received treatments between 2001 and 2012 from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database were identified based on the ICD-9 code: 431. The main outcome of AKI during hospitalizations was confirmed based on the KDIGO criteria. Overall, ICH patients were randomly divided into the training cohort and validation cohort with the ratio of 7:3. Six machine learning algorithms including extreme gradient boosting, logistic, light gradient boosting machine, random forest, adaptive boosting, support vector machine were trained in the training cohort with the 5-fold cross-validation method to predict the AKI. The predictive accuracy of those algorithms was compared by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results: A total of 1213 ICH patients were included with the incidence of AKI being 29.3%. The incidence of AKI was 29.3% among the 1213 patients with ICH. The AKI group had higher 30-day mortality (p<0.001), longer ICU stay (p<0.001), and longer hospital stay (p<0.001). Among the six machine learning algorithms, the random forest performed the best in predicting AKI in both the training cohort (AUC=1.000) and the validation cohort (AUC=0.698). The top five features in the random forest algorithm-based model were platelets, serum creatinine, vancomycin, hemoglobin, and hematocrit. Conclusion: The random forest algorithm-based predictive model we developed incorporating important features, including platelet count, serum creatinine level, vancomycin level, hemoglobin level, and hematocrit level, performed the best in predicting AKI among patients with ICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.