Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106337›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

The multiple reference range of mean uterine artery pulsatility index for natural and in vitro fertilization singletons during 11-14 gestational weeks.

Zi-Han Niu, Yun-Shu Ouyang, Yi-Xiu Zhang, Zhong-Hui Xu, Meng Yang, Jia Lu, Xi-Ning Wu, Pei-Pei Zhang, Qing Dai, Ke Lv and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zi-Han Niu *Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yun-Shu Ouyang *Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yi-Xiu ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhong-Hui XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Meng YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jia LuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xi-Ning WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Pei-Pei ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qing DaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ke LvDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu-Xin JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hua MengDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jin-Song GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultrasonography of the uterine artery (UtA) in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy can assess uterine-placental blood perfusion and guide early clinical prevention. Establishing normal ranges of the UtA pulsatility index (UtA-PI) at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy is helpful for the early identification of high-risk pregnant women and improving the prognosis. This study aimed to establish a reference range of UtA-PI based on crown-rump length (CRL) for spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancy during 11-14 weeks, respectively. Methods: A prospective study was performed at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Healthy, low-risk women with a singleton pregnancy at 11-14 gestational weeks were consecutively recruited for this study from December 2017 to December 2020. All participants underwent routine prenatal ultrasound examination. The CRL of the fetus and the UtA-PI were measured in both uterine arteries, and average values were calculated. The LMS method was used to fit the percentile (P)5, P10, P25, P50, P75, P90, and P95 curves of the UtA-PI value of spontaneous and IVF singleton pregnancy with CRL changes, respectively. Results: A total of 1,962 pregnant women with normal fetuses were included in this study, including 1,792 pregnancies conceived naturally and 170 IVF fetuses. The UtA-PI reference range in the spontaneous pregnancy group was consistently higher than that in the IVF group during 11-14 weeks, and showed a statistically significant difference in UtA-PI for spontaneous and IVF pregnancies (P<0.001). According to the LMS method, each percentile curve of UtA-PI decreased with the increase of CRL in both the natural pregnancy group and the IVF group. The P95 range of UtA-PI for pregnant women with naturally conceived and IVF pregnancy was 2.74 to 2.11 and 2.50 to 1.94, respectively. The overall change of UtA-PI differentials of the two groups showed a downward trend and decreased slightly with the increase of CRL. Conclusions: This study provided a single-center, large sample of data and constructed a CRL-based reference value of UtA-PI for spontaneous and IVF singleton pregnancy, which provides a reliable basis for early UtA evaluation and early clinical decision-making during 11-14 gestational weeks.

Indexed as

crown-rump length (CRL)LMS methodpercentile valuesUterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI)

Identifiers

PMID38106337
PMCPMC10722048
OpenAlexW4388973685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.