ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Prior information-guided reconstruction network for positron emission tomography images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deep learning has recently shown great potential in medical image reconstruction tasks. For positron emission tomography (PET) images, the direct reconstruction from raw data to radioactivity images using deep learning without any constraint may lead to the production of nonexistent structures. The aim of this study was to specifically develop and test a flexibly deep learning-based reconstruction network guided by any form of prior knowledge to achieve high quality and high reliability reconstruction. Methods: We developed a novel prior information-guided reconstruction network (PIGRN) with a dual-channel generator and a 2-scale discriminator based on a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN). Besides the raw data channel, an additional channel is provided in the generator for prior information (PI) to guide the training phase. The PI can be reconstructed images obtained via conventional methods, nuclear medical images from other modalities, attenuation correction maps from time-of-flight-PET (TOF-PET) data, or any other physical parameters. For this study, the reconstructed images generated by filtered back projection (FBP) were chosen as the input of the additional channel. To improve the image quality, a 2-scale discriminator was adopted which can focus on both the coarse and fine field of the reconstruction images. Experiments were carried out on both a simulation dataset and a real Sprague Dawley (SD) rat dataset. Results: Two classic deep learning-based reconstruction networks, including U-Net and Deep-PET, were compared in our study. Compared with these two methods, our method could provide much higher quality PET image reconstruction in the study of the simulation dataset. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) value reached 31.8498, and the structure similarity index measure (SSIM) value reached 0.9754. The real study on SD rats indicated that the proposed network also has strong generalization ability. Conclusions: The flexible PIGRN based on cGAN for PET images combines both raw data and PI. The results of comparison experiments and a generalization experiment based on simulation and SD rat datasets demonstrated that the proposed PIGRN has the ability to improve image quality and has strong generalization ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.