ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Automatic calculation of myocardial perfusion reserve using deep learning with uncertainty quantification.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision of automatically generated generic regions of interest for direct assessment of perfusion-MRI.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation of left ventricular myocardium on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a comprehensive evaluation across temporal frames.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important indicator of ischemia, and its measurement typically involves manual procedures. The purposes of this study were to develop a fully automatic method for estimating the MPRI and to evaluate its performance. Methods: The method consisted of segmenting the myocardium in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) myocardial perfusion MRI data using Monte Carlo dropout U-Net, dividing the myocardium into segments based on landmark localization with machine learning, and estimating the MPRI after the calculation of the left ventricular and myocardial contrast upslopes. The proposed method was compared with a reference method, which involved manual adjustments of the myocardial contours and upslope ranges. Results: In test subjects, MPRIs measured by the proposed technique correlated with those by the manual reference in segmental assessment [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =0.75, 95% CI: 0.70-0.79, P<0.001]. The automatic and reference MPRI values showed a mean difference of -0.02 and 95% limits of agreement of (-0.86, 0.82). Conclusions: The proposed automatic method is based on deep learning segmentation and machine learning landmark detection for MPRI measurements in DCE perfusion MRI. It holds the potential to efficiently and quantitatively assess myocardial ischemia without any user's interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.