ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Clinicopathological and computed tomography features associated with recurrence-free survival of patients with small-sized peripheral invasive lung adenocarcinoma after sublobectomy.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D deep learning model to predict the recurrence of stage IA invasive lung adenocarcinoma after sub-lobar resection: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging appearances, CT evolution patterns, and surgical prognosis of stage I lung squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- 3D computed tomography density of stage T1 lung cancer, which value is most stable for predicting its invasiveness?Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sublobar resection is gradually becoming a standard treatment for small-sized (≤2 cm) peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) being the most frequent histologic subtype. However, the prognostic predictors for preoperatively determining whether sublobectomy is feasible for patients with early LADC have not yet been well identified. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological and computed tomography (CT) features associated with the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with small-sized invasive LADC (SILADC) after sublobar resection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 107 patients with SILADC who underwent preoperative chest CT scan and sublobar resection from December 2012 to March 2019. The Kaplan-Meier survival was used to analyze the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics, preoperative chest CT findings, and RFS. The Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors of poor RFS. Results: For clinicopathological characteristics, RFS was shorter in patients aged ≥70 years, smokers, and those with micropapillary/solid-predominant adenocarcinomas (all P values <0.05). For preoperative CT features, RFS was shorter in patients with tumor size ≥1.4 cm, solid component size ≥1.1 cm, proportion of solid component ≥72%, solid density, spiculation, vascular convergence sign, peripheral fibrosis, and type II pleural tag (all P values <0.05). Multivariate analysis showed proportion of solid component ≥72% [hazard ratio (HR): 5.920; P=0.006; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.686-20.794], spiculation (HR: 5.026; P=0.001; 95% CI: 2.008-12.581), and type II pleural tag (HR: 4.638; P=0.002; 95% CI: 1.773-12.136) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with SILADC after sub-lobectomy. Conclusions: Clinicopathological and CT characteristics are helpful for predicting the RFS of patients with SILADC after sublobar resection and can be used as an auxiliary tool for thoracic surgeons to choose the best surgical mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.