Assessment of different sonographic cervical measures to predict labor induction outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Induction of labor (IOL) is a common obstetric approach to start or encourage uterine contractions to achieve a vaginal birth. It is recommended when continuing the pregnancy may be more dangerous for the mother or baby. Different ultrasonographic measures, such as cervical length, have been investigated as possible predictors of the outcomes of IOL. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasound measurements in anticipating successful IOL. Methods: The study conducted a thorough search on three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) until 04 March 2023, to find clinical studies published in English that reported different sonographic cervical measures and their ability to predict IOL outcomes. The chosen studies were stratified based on the type of indicator reported, and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the best indicator for both successful and failed induction. The risk of bias and concerns about the applicability of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) method. Results: This study analyzed 57 studies with 9,338 patients. Cervical length is moderately effective in predicting successful IOL, with pooled sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of 0.67 and 0.70, respectively. However, cervical length had a pooled SN and SP of 0.70 and 0.61 for predicting failed IOL. The posterior cervical angle was found to have a higher pooled SN and SP of 0.79 and 0.73 for predicting successful IOL. Fetal head-perineum distance demonstrated moderate accuracy with a pooled SN, SP, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve of 0.58, 0.66, 1.95, 0.36, 5.33, and 0.9992, respectively, for predicting successful IOL. Conclusions: Fetal head-perineum distance was the most effective predictor for successful IOL compared to cervical length, which only had a moderate predictive ability. Shortening of cervical length was not a useful indicator for successful IOL. On the other hand, the posterior cervical angle was the most reliable factor for predicting failed induction. The study's findings can aid in developing more effective management strategies for IOL.