ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Predicting the pathological invasiveness in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule via Shapley additive explanations interpretation of a tree-based machine learning radiomics model: a multicenter study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics model explained by the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method for predicting preoperative diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and adrenal adenoma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer via intratumoral and peritumoral multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging machine learning-based radiomics with Shapley additive explanations interpretability analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Establishing predictive models for malignant and inflammatory pulmonary nodules using clinical data and CT imaging features.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Development and validation of multiple machine learning algorithms for differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from adult-type diffuse glioma: an interpretable and multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A literature review of artificial intelligence (AI) for medical image segmentation: from AI and explainable AI to trustworthy AI.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model explained by the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method for predicting complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- An interpretable clinical ultrasound-radiomics combined model for diagnosis of stage I cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiomics models could help assess the benign and malignant invasiveness and prognosis of pulmonary nodules. However, the lack of interpretability limits application of these models. We thus aimed to construct and validate an interpretable and generalized computed tomography (CT) radiomics model to evaluate the pathological invasiveness in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule in order to improve the management of these patients. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 248 patients with CT-diagnosed solitary pulmonary nodules. Radiomic features were extracted from nodular region and perinodular regions of 3 and 5 mm. After coarse-to-fine feature selection, the radiomics score (radscore) was calculated using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic method. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the invasiveness-related clinicoradiological factors. The clinical-radiomics model was then constructed using the logistic and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was then used to explain the contributions of the features. After removing batch effects with the ComBat algorithm, we assessed the generalization of the explainable clinical-radiomics model in two independent external validation cohorts (n=147 and n=149). Results: The clinical-radiomic XGBoost model integrating the radscore, CT value, nodule length, and crescent sign demonstrated better predictive performance than did the clinical-radiomics logistic model in assessing pulmonary nodule invasiveness, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.889 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.848-0.927] in the training cohort. The SHAP algorithm illustrates the contribution of each feature in the final model. The specific model decision process was visualized using a tree-based decision heatmap. Satisfactory generalization performance was shown with AUCs of 0.889 (95% CI, 0.823-0.942) and 0.915 (95% CI, 0.851-0.963) in the two external validation cohorts. Conclusions: An interpretable and generalized clinical-radiomics model for predicting pulmonary nodule invasibility was constructed to help clinicians determine the invasiveness of pulmonary nodules and devise assessment strategies in an easily understandable manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.