ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Developing a novel quasi-3D movable water phantom for radiation therapy workable in the magnetic resonance environment.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators (MR-LINACs) for clinical treatment has opened up new possibilities and challenges in the field of radiation oncology. However, annual quality assurance (QA) is relatively understudied due to practical considerations. Thus, to overcome the difficulty of measuring the dose with a small water phantom for TRS-398 or TG-51 in all external beam radiation treatment unit environments, such as MR compatibility, we designed a remote phantom with a three-axis changeable capacity for QA. Methods: The designed water phantom was tested under an MR environment. The water phantom system comprised of three parts: a phantom box, a dose measurement tool, and a PMD401 drive system. The UNIDOSE universal dosimeter was used to collect beam data. The manufacturer's developer tools were utilized to position the measurement. To ensure magnetic field homogeneity, a distortion phantom was prepared using sixty fish oil capsules aligned radially to distinguish the oil and free air. The phantom was scanned in both the MR simulator and computed tomography (CT), and the acquired images were analyzed to determine the position shift. Results: The dimensions of the device are 30 cm in the X-axis, 20 cm in the Y-axis, and 17 cm in the Z-axis. Total cost of materials was no more than $10,000 US dollars. Our results indicate that the device can function normally in a regular 1.5 T MR environment without interference from the magnetic field. The water phantom's traveling speed was found to be approximately 5 mm/s with a position difference confined within 6 cm intervals during normal use. The distortion test results showed that the prepared MR environment has uniform magnetic field homogeneity. Conclusions: In this study, we constructed a prototype water phantom device that can function in an MR simulator without interference between the magnetic field and electronic components. Compared to other commercially available MR-LINAC water phantoms, our device offers a more cost-effective solution for routine monthly QA. It can shorten the duration of QA tests and relieve the burden on medical physicists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.