Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106212›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Low-Cost Otolaryngology Simulation Models for Early-Stage Trainees: A Scoping Review.

Joselyne Nzisabira, Sarah Nuss, Estephanía Candelo, Ernest Aben Oumo, Keshav V Shah, Eric K Kim, Joshua Wiedermann, Ornella Masimbi, Natnael Shimelash, Mary Jue Xu

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprintScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Joselyne NzisabiraUniversity of Global Health Equity.
Sarah NussBrown University Warren Alpert Medical School.
Estephanía CandeloFundación Valle del Lili.
Ernest Aben OumoUniversity of Global Health Equity.
Keshav V ShahUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Eric K KimUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Joshua WiedermannMayo Clinic.
Ornella MasimbiUniversity of Global Health Equity.
Natnael ShimelashUniversity of Global Health Equity.
Mary Jue XuUniversity of California, San Francisco.
University of Global Health Equity · RWUniversity of California, San Francisco · USBrown University · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USFundación Valle del Lili · COWinnMed · US

Funding

Partnership for Global Health Research Training Program (Renewal)-Supplement for OBSSR, NCI, NCI-AIDS and NIDCDD43TW010543 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Wafaie W Fawzi, DAVIDSON HOWES HAMER · 2017 to 2026
$12.1M
mHealth-Community Health Worker tool for comprehensive post-cesarean follow-up in rural RwandaR21HD103052 · NICHD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HEDT-GAUTHIER, BETHANY · 2021 to 2022
$415k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010543NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD103052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is a notable lack of low-cost OHNS simulation models that are relevant for early medical trainees and students. By conducting this study, we will understand the current landscape of low-cost otolaryngology-head and neck surgery simulation for early medical trainees and students. Objectives: Medical simulation is essential for surgical training yet is often too expensive and inaccessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Furthermore, in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS), while simulation training is often focused on senior residents and specialists, there is a critical need to target general practitioners who carry a significant load of OHNS care in countries with limited OHNS providers. This scoping review aims to describe affordable, effective OHNS simulation models for early-stage trainees and non-OHNS specialists in resource-limited settings and discuss gaps in the literature. Evidence Review: This scoping review followed the five stages of Arksey and O'Malley's Scoping Review Methodology. Seven databases were used to search for articles. Included articles discussed physical models of the ear, nose, or throat described as "low-cost," "cost-effective," or defined as <$150 if explicitly stated; related to the management of common and emergent OHNS conditions; and geared towards undergraduate students, medical, dental, or nursing students, and/or early-level residents. Findings: Of the 1706 studies screened, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in HICs. Most models were low fidelity (less anatomically realistic) models. The most common simulated skills were peritonsillar abscess aspiration and cricothyrotomy. Information on cost was limited, and locally sourced materials were infrequently mentioned. Simulations were evaluated using questionnaires and direct observation. Conclusion and Relevance: Low-cost simulation models can be beneficial for early medical trainees and students in LMICs, addressing resource constraints and improving skill acquisition. However, there is a notable lack of contextually relevant, locally developed, and cost-effective models. This study summarizes existing low-cost OHNS simulation models for early-stage trainees and highlights the need for additional locally sourced models. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of these models.

Indexed as

low- and middle-income countryLow-costmedical studentotolaryngologysimulationtask trainertrainee

Identifiers

PMID38106212
PMCPMC10723536
OpenAlexW4389474853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.