Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106144›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Design and Fitness Prediction.

Pascal Notin, Aaron W Kollasch, Daniel Ritter, Lood van Niekerk, Steffanie Paul, Hansen Spinner, Nathan Rollins, Ada Shaw, Ruben Weitzman, Jonathan Frazer and 5 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pascal NotinComputer Science, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0002-1877-8983
Aaron W KollaschSystems Biology, Harvard Medical School.ORCID 0000-0001-9733-8822
Daniel RitterSystems Biology, Harvard Medical School.ORCID 0009-0009-3266-9917
Lood van NiekerkSystems Biology, Harvard Medical School.ORCID 0000-0001-9082-2574
Steffanie PaulSystems Biology, Harvard Medical School.ORCID 0000-0001-7306-4863
Hansen SpinnerSystems Biology, Harvard Medical School.
Nathan RollinsSeismic Therapeutic.ORCID 0000-0002-8037-6045
Ada ShawApplied Mathematics, Harvard University.ORCID 0000-0002-5283-9559
Ruben WeitzmanComputer Science, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0001-5882-2005
Jonathan FrazerCentre for Genomic Regulation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.ORCID 0000-0001-6900-6484
Mafalda DiasCentre for Genomic Regulation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.ORCID 0000-0002-1804-8542
Dinko FranceschiSystems Biology, Harvard Medical School.
Rose OrenbuchSystems Biology, Harvard Medical School.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-0837
Yarin GalComputer Science, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-2078
Debora S MarksHarvard Medical School, Broad Institute.ORCID 0000-0001-9388-2281

Funding

Making antibody generation rapid, scalable, and democratic through machine learning and continuous evolutionR01CA260415 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KRUSE, ANDREW, LIU, CHANG C · 2020 to 2024
$8.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260415Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the effects of mutations in proteins is critical to many applications, from understanding genetic disease to designing novel proteins that can address our most pressing challenges in climate, agriculture and healthcare. Despite a surge in machine learning-based protein models to tackle these questions, an assessment of their respective benefits is challenging due to the use of distinct, often contrived, experimental datasets, and the variable performance of models across different protein families. Addressing these challenges requires scale. To that end we introduce ProteinGym, a large-scale and holistic set of benchmarks specifically designed for protein fitness prediction and design. It encompasses both a broad collection of over 250 standardized deep mutational scanning assays, spanning millions of mutated sequences, as well as curated clinical datasets providing high-quality expert annotations about mutation effects. We devise a robust evaluation framework that combines metrics for both fitness prediction and design, factors in known limitations of the underlying experimental methods, and covers both zero-shot and supervised settings. We report the performance of a diverse set of over 70 high-performing models from various subfields (eg., alignment-based, inverse folding) into a unified benchmark suite. We open source the corresponding codebase, datasets, MSAs, structures, model predictions and develop a user-friendly website that facilitates data access and analysis.

Identifiers

PMID38106144
PMCPMC10723403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.