Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38106130›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks.

Madeline Peterson, Rodrigo M Braga, Dorothea L Floris, Jared A Nielsen

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeline PetersonDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4249-2774
Rodrigo M BragaDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Dorothea L FlorisMethods of Plasticity Research, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-6821
Jared A NielsenDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2717-193X

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Neuropathology CoreP30AG013854 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BIGIO, EILEEN H. · 1996 to 2020
$28.9M
Research Education Core FP30AG072977 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ROBERT J VASSAR · 2021 to 2026
$26.3M
Mapping the Human Connectome During Typical DevelopmentU01MH109589 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARCH, DEANNA, BOOKHEIMER, SUSAN Y · 2016 to 2019
$17.1M
CAUSAL MECHANISMS OF DISTRIBUTED BRAIN NETWORK FUNCTION DURING EPISODIC MEMORY RETRIEVALR00MH117226 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BRAGA, RODRIGO M · 2020 to 2022
$744k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013854NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072977NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH117226NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109589NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two hemispheres of the human brain are functionally asymmetric. At the network level, the language network exhibits left-hemisphere lateralization. While this asymmetry is widely replicated, the extent to which other functional networks demonstrate lateralization remains a subject of Investigation. Additionally, it is unknown how the lateralization of one functional network may affect the lateralization of other networks within individuals. We quantified lateralization for each of 17 networks by computing the relative surface area on the left and right cerebral hemispheres. After examining the ecological, convergent, and external validity and test-retest reliability of this surface area-based measure of lateralization, we addressed two hypotheses across multiple datasets (Human Connectome Project = 553, Human Connectome Project-Development = 343, Natural Scenes Dataset = 8). First, we hypothesized that networks associated with language, visuospatial attention, and executive control would show the greatest lateralization. Second, we hypothesized that relationships between lateralized networks would follow a dependent relationship such that greater left-lateralization of a network would be associated with greater right-lateralization of a different network within individuals, and that this pattern would be systematic across individuals. A language network was among the three networks identified as being significantly left-lateralized, and attention and executive control networks were among the five networks identified as being significantly right-lateralized. Next, correlation matrices, an exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the second hypothesis and examine the organization of lateralized networks. We found general support for a dependent relationship between highly left- and right-lateralized networks, meaning that across subjects, greater left lateralization of a given network (such as a language network) was linked to greater right lateralization of another network (such as a ventral attention/salience network) and vice versa. These results further our understanding of brain organization at the macro-scale network level in individuals, carrying specific relevance for neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by disruptions in lateralization such as autism and schizophrenia.

Indexed as

asymmetryattentionbrain networksfMRIlanguageLateralization

Identifiers

PMID38106130
PMCPMC10723397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.