Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105921›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2023

Transradial intervention in dialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese nationwide registry study.

Toshiki Kuno, Kyohei Yamaji, Tadao Aikawa, Mitsuaki Sawano, Tomo Ando, Yohei Numasawa, Hideki Wada, Tetsuya Amano, Ken Kozuma, Shun Kohsaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Application and Outcomes of Coronary Atherectomy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Report From the J-PCI Registry.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshiki KunoDivision of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467-2401, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2487-8366
Kyohei YamajiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-9186
Tadao AikawaDepartment of Cardiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0176
Mitsuaki SawanoCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tomo AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Kawasaki Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yohei NumasawaDepartment of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan.
Hideki WadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Izunokuni, Japan.
Tetsuya AmanoDepartment of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Ken KozumaDivision of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun KohsakaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Aichi Medical University · JPAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USAshikaga Red Cross Hospital · JPJuntendo University Shizuoka Hospital · JPJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPKawasaki Hospital · JPKeio University · JPKyoto University · JPTeikyo University · JPYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Transradial intervention (TRI) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used to reduce periprocedural complications. However, its effectiveness and safety for patients on dialysis are not well established. We aimed to investigate the association of TRI with in-hospital complications in dialysis patients undergoing PCI. Methods and results: We included 44 462 patients on dialysis who underwent PCI using Japanese nationwide PCI registry data (2019-21) regardless of acute or chronic coronary syndrome. Patients were categorized based on access site: TRI, transfemoral intervention (TFI). Periprocedural access site bleeding complication requiring transfusion was the primary outcome and in-hospital death, and other periprocedural complications were the secondary outcomes. Matched weighted analysis was performed for TRI and TFI. Here, 8267 (18.6%) underwent TRI, and 36 195 (81.4%) underwent TFI. Patients who received TRI were older and had lower rates of comorbidities than those who received TFI. Access site bleeding rate and in-hospital death were significantly lower in the TRI group (0.1% vs. 0.7%, Conclusion: In patients undergoing dialysis and PCI, TRI had a lower risk of access site bleeding and in-hospital death than TFI. This suggests that TRI may be safer for this patient population.

Indexed as

DialysisPercutaneous coronary interventionPeriprocedural access site bleedingTransradial intervention

Identifiers

PMID38105921
PMCPMC10721448
OpenAlexW4388667471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.