Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105911›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

The Phase 3 INVIGORATE Trial of Reproxalap in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Christopher E Starr, Kelly K Nichols, Jacob R Lang, Todd C Brady

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04207736 (The INVIGORATE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04207736 phase3completednot on this map

The INVIGORATE Trial: A Randomized, Double-masked, Crossover Design, Vehicle-controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%) Compared to Vehicle in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2019 to 2021Enrolled95ConditionsAllergic ConjunctivitisArmsReproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25%), Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher E StarrDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Kelly K NicholsSchool of Optometry, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2937-1457
Jacob R LangCollege of Optometry, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Todd C BradyAldeyra Therapeutics, Lexington, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3399-4673
Cornell University · USUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There is an unmet need for new treatments for allergic conjunctivitis. Objective: To assess the activity of reproxalap, a novel reactive aldehyde species modulator, in a real-world model of seasonal allergen exposure. Methods: The INVIGORATE Trial, a prospective, quadruple-masked, vehicle-controlled, crossover, sequence-randomized Phase 3 trial, tested the efficacy of reproxalap in adults with a history of moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis, ragweed pollen allergy, and allergen chamber-induced ocular itching and redness. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 0.25% reproxalap ophthalmic solution or vehicle, followed by a 2-week washout period before crossing over to the other test article. The primary endpoint was ocular itching from 110 to 210 minutes after chamber entry; the key secondary endpoint was ocular redness over the chamber duration (0-4 scales for both endpoints). Results: Of the 95 randomly assigned patients, 89 completed all visits (reproxalap to vehicle: n = 46; vehicle to reproxalap: n = 43). Primary and key secondary endpoints were met: reproxalap significantly reduced ocular itching (mean [SE]: -0.50 [0.03], p < 0.001) and redness (-0.14 [0.01], p < 0.001) relative to vehicle. Responder analyses confirmed the clinical relevance of both end points. Reproxalap was safe and well tolerated. No clinically significant changes in safety assessments were observed. No serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported. The most commonly reported TEAE was mild and transient installation site irritation after reproxalap versus vehicle administration. Conclusion: In this well-controlled allergen chamber trial, reproxalap was statistically superior to vehicle across typical symptoms and signs of allergic conjunctivitis. Trial Registration: NCT04207736.

Indexed as

allergic conjunctivitisocular itchingocular rednessreactive aldehyde speciesreproxalap

Identifiers

PMID38105911
PMCPMC10725700
OpenAlexW4389640566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.