Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105894›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Deep learning models for preoperative T-stage assessment in rectal cancer using MRI: exploring the impact of rectal filling.

Chang Tian, Xiaolu Ma, Haidi Lu, Qian Wang, Chengwei Shao, Yuan Yuan, Fu Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chang TianSchool of Information Science and Technology and School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolu MaDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Haidi LuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qian WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Chengwei ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan Yuan *Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fu Shen *Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, The Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was twofold: firstly, to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of rectal cancer (RC) lesions, and secondly, to construct classification models to differentiate between different T-stages of RC. Additionally, it was attempted to investigate the potential benefits of rectal filling in improving the performance of deep learning (DL) models. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, including 317 consecutive patients with RC who underwent MRI scans. The datasets were randomly divided into a training set ( Results: The automatic segmentation showed excellent performance. The rectal-filling dataset exhibited superior results in terms of DSC and ASD ( Conclusion: This study highlighted the utility of DL-based automatic segmentation and classification models for preoperative T-stage assessment of RC on T2WI, particularly in the rectal-filling dataset. Compared with subjective evaluation, the models exhibited superior performance, suggesting their noticeable potential for enhancing clinical diagnosis and treatment practices.

Indexed as

deep learningMRIrectal cancerrectal fillingT staging

Identifiers

PMID38105894
PMCPMC10722089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.