Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105847›Full record

ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2023

Assessment of CAD/CAM Customized V Pattern Plate Versus Standard Miniplates Fixation in Mandibular Angle Fracture (Randomized Clinical Trial).

Hiba Obad Saleh, Basma Gamal Moussa, Khaled Amr Salah Eddin, Samer Abduljabar Noman, Ahmed Mohammed Salah

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03761524 (Evaluation of the Effect of Customized V Plate Fixation Versus a Conventional Superior -Inferior Miniplates Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture on Mouth Opening and Radiographical Parameters Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03761524 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Effect of Customized V Plate Fixation Versus a Conventional Superior -Inferior Miniplates Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture on Mouth Opening and Radiographical Parameters Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled24ConditionsMandibular FracturesArmsCustomized V plate fixation, Conventional miniplates fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiba Obad SalehDepartment Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6798-7327
Basma Gamal MoussaDepartment Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Khaled Amr Salah EddinDepartment Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Samer Abduljabar NomanDepartment Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed Mohammed SalahDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Cairo University · EGSana'a University · YE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mandibular angle is the most common site for fractures, accounting for 23-42% of all cases of mandibular fractures. A customized fixation system is designed directly for a specific patient, which reduces the time spent bending and fixing the plate during the operation. This study was designed to assess the effect of CAD/CAM customized V pattern plate versus standard miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial included 26 patients suffering from mandibular angle fracture. Patients were selected from Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University and Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital. Study group (13) needed open reduction and internal fixation by using CAD/CAM V plate with surgical guide, while control group (13) needed open reduction and internal fixation by using standard superior-inferior miniplate fixation. The patients were then followed up for one year postoperatively. Results: It showed that there was a statistical difference between the study group and the control group regarding postoperative pain, occlusion, and maximal interincisal opening ( Conclusion: CAD/CAM customized V pattern plate is a suitable plate design because it offers sufficient stability for normal bone healing, the creation of an ideal occlusion, an early return to function, and adequate postoperative radiographic outcomes. Trial Registration: It was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT03761524. Registration date: 03.12.2018.

Indexed as

Customized plateMandibular angle fractureMimics’ softwarePostoperative complicationSuperior–inferior plateVirtual planning

Identifiers

PMID38105847
PMCPMC10719228
OpenAlexW4387972953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.