Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105793›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2023

Climate change and public health in Germany - A synthesis of options for action from the German status report on climate change and health 2023.

Martin Mlinarić, Susanne Moebus, Cornelia Betsch, Elke Hertig, Judith Schröder, Julika Loss, Ramona Moosburger, Petra van Rüth, Sophie Gepp, Maike Voss and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Heat dome in Germany and how well we are prepared for it].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Martin MlinarićRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne MoebusUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, University Medicine Essen, Institute for Urban Public Health.
Cornelia BetschUniversity of Erfurt, Germany, Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour.
Elke HertigUniversity of Augsburg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine.
Judith SchröderUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, University Medicine Essen, Institute for Urban Public Health.
Julika LossRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Ramona MoosburgerRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Petra van RüthGerman Environment Agency, Subject area I 1.6 KomPass - Climate Impacts and Adaptation, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.
Sophie GeppCentre for Planetary Health Policy, Berlin, Germany.
Maike VossCentre for Planetary Health Policy, Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang StraffGerman Environment Agency, Subject area II 1.5 Environmental medicine and health assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Tanja-Maria KesselFederal Centre for Health Education, Cologne, Germany.
Michaela GoeckeFederal Centre for Health Education, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas MatzarakisGerman Meteorological Service, Research Centre Human Biometeorology, Freiburg, Germany.
Hildegard NiemannRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This article represents the conclusion of the updated German status report on climate change and health, which was jointly written by authors from over 30 national institutions and organisations. The objectives are (a) to synthesise the options for action formulated in the report, (b) to combine them into clusters and guiding principles, (c) to address the success factors for implementation, and (d) to combine the options for action into target parameters. Methods: The options for action from the individual contributions of the status report were systematically recorded and categorised (n=236). Topical clusters were then formed with reference to Essential Public Health Functions, and options for action were assigned to them. Results: Eight topical clusters of options for action and ten guiding principles were identified. These can be summarised in four overarching meta-levels of action: (a) cross-sectorally coordinated structural and behavioural prevention, (b) monitoring, surveillance, and digitalisation (including early warning systems), (c) development of an ecologically sustainable and resilient public health system, and (d) information, communication, and participation. The main success factors for implementation are the design of governance, positive storytelling and risk communication, proactive management of conflicting goals, and a cross-sectoral co-benefit approach. Conclusions: Based on the status report, systematically compiled target parameters and concrete options for action are available for public health.

Indexed as

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATIONCLIMATE PROTECTIONCO-BENEFITSCOMMUNICATIONCROSS-SECTORALITYPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID38105793
PMCPMC10722518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.