Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105792›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2023

Communicating climate change and health to specific target groups.

Lena Lehrer, Lennart Hellmann, Hellen Temme, Leonie Otten, Johanna Hübenthal, Mattis Geiger, Mirjam A Jenny, Cornelia Betsch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lena LehrerBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Implementation Research, Health Communication Working Group, Hamburg, Germany.
Lennart HellmannInstitute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, Germany, Health Communication.
Hellen TemmeBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Implementation Research, Health Communication Working Group, Hamburg, Germany.
Leonie OttenInstitute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, Germany, Health Communication.
Johanna HübenthalInstitute for Planetary Health Behaviour, University of Erfurt, Germany, Health Communication.
Mattis GeigerBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Implementation Research, Health Communication Working Group, Hamburg, Germany.
Mirjam A JennyBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Implementation Research, Health Communication Working Group, Hamburg, Germany.
Cornelia BetschBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Implementation Research, Health Communication Working Group, Hamburg, Germany.
University of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The German status report on climate change and health 2023 identifies numerous health risks that are caused or exacerbated by climate change. One recommendation arising from the report is to strengthen education, information, and communication in the field. This article aims to serve as a basis for this. Methods: Based on four survey waves (2022/2023) of the PACE study (Planetary Health Action Survey, n=3,845, online), the status of risk perception as well as the Readiness to Act against climate change in the adult population in Germany is examined and a target group analysis is carried out. Results: Some health risks due to the climate crisis are perceived as comparatively low (e.g. mental health problems). People with higher risk perception show a higher Readiness to Act. Younger people, men, people with low education, and those living in smaller communities are identified as relevant target groups as they have a lower Readiness to Act. One third state that they never or hardly ever seek out specific information on climate change. Media use differs depending on target group. Conclusions: Target group-specific communication can help to educate people about the health impacts of the climate crisis. In the discussion of this article, implications from existing literature are discussed in detail, which offer practical guidance for effective climate change communication.

Indexed as

CLIMATE PROTECTIONCOMMUNICATIONINFORMATION BEHAVIOURPLANETARY HEALTHREADINESS TO ACT

Identifiers

PMID38105792
PMCPMC10722519
OpenAlexW4389900299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.