ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Direct Comparison of the Hinge-Cleaving Proteases IgdE and BdpK for LC-MS-Based IgG1 Clonal Profiling.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Widespread Fab-arm exchange affects all endogenous serum IgG4.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry of Antibodies.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025Review
- Functional insights from recombinant production of bacterial proteases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Persistent IgG1 clones dominate and personalize the plasma antibody repertoire.Science advances · 2025Article
- Protein-Centric Analysis of Personalized Antibody Repertoires Using LC-MS-Based Fab-Profiling on a timsTOF.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human antibodies are heterogeneous molecules primarily due to clonal sequence variations. Analytical techniques to assess antibody levels quantitatively, such as ELISA, lack the power to resolve abundances at the clonal level. Recently, we introduced an LC-MS-based approach that can distinguish and quantify antibody clones using the mass and retention time of their corresponding Fab-fragments. We used specific hinge-cleaving protease IgdE (FabALACTICA) to release the Fab-fragments from the constant Fc region of the antibody. Here, we explore an alternative IgG1 hinge-cleaving protease, BdpK (FabDELLO), and compare it directly to IgdE for use in IgG1 repertoire profiling. We used IgdE and BdpK in parallel to digest all IgG1s from the same set of plasma samples. Both proteases cleave IgG1 specifically in the hinge, albeit via different mechanisms and at two distinct cleavage sites. Notwithstanding these differences, the Fab fragments generated by IgdE or BdpK produced highly similar clonal repertoires. However, IgdE required ∼16 h of incubation to digest plasma IgG1s, while BdpK required ∼2 h. We authenticated the similarity of the clones by top-down proteomics using electron transfer dissociation. We conclude that BdpK performs very well in digesting polyclonal plasma IgG1s and that neither BdpK nor IgdE displays detectable biases in cleaving IgG1s. We anticipate that BdpK may emerge as the preferred protease for IgG1 hinge-digestion because it offers a shorter digestion time compared to IgdE, an equally specific digestion site, and no bias against any IgG1 present in plasma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.