ArticleScience progress
Ten-year follow up of incidental spontaneous extracranial internal carotid artery dissection in a Japanese asymptomatic older man: A case report.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report presents a unique finding of an incidental right internal carotid artery dissection in an asymptomatic 69-year-old man. The report highlights the possible trigger and long-term outcomes of this condition. The patient had participated in Japanese archery competitions for many years. His medical history included hypertension and a prior ischemic stroke in the left lateral medulla, resulting in Wallenberg syndrome. During a routine visit, head magnetic resonance angiography revealed right internal carotid artery dissection. He was managed conservatively with antiplatelet therapy and close monitoring. Follow-up imaging after 10 years showed no changes, and the patient remained asymptomatic. Therefore, routine screening for incidental findings is important even in asymptomatic patients. Archery competitions may be a possible trigger for internal carotid artery dissection. The presence of re-entry in the lesion at the time of onset can be a predictor of a good long-term prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.