Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105381›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Comparison Results of Three-Port Robot-Assisted and Uniportal Video-Assisted Lobectomy for Functional Recovery Index in the Treatment of Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Haixiao Diao, Lin Xu, Xiao Li, Yancheng Wang, Zhongmin Peng

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Initial outcomes with uniportal video-assisted lung resection.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haixiao DiaoShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Lin XuShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Xiao LiShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yancheng WangShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Zhongmin PengShandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China. pzm0803@163.com.
Shandong Provincial Hospital · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive lobectomy is the standard treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to investigate postoperative recovery in a prospective trial of discharged patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer undergoing robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (UVATS). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis is a prospective and observational study. From 9 September 2022 to 1 July 2023, 178 patients diagnosed with NSCLC admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Shandong Provincial Hospital signed informed consent and underwent lobectomy by RATS and UVATS. The functional recovery index included MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, Christensen Fatigue Scale, EORTC QLQ-C30, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire.

resultsAfter propensity score-matched analysis, each group included 42 cases. For the baseline characteristics of patients, operation time (p = 0.01) and length of stay (p = 0.04) were shorter in the RATS group. The number of lymph nodes resected in the RATS group was much more than in the UVATS group. According to our investigation, appetite loss, nausea, diarrhea, and cough severity after RATS were better than after UVATS. After the first week, pain severity degree of the RATS group was higher than UVATS, while there was no difference during the second and third week. The physical score of the RATS group was higher than the UVATS group (p = 0.04), according to the Leicester Cough Questionnaire.

conclusionRATS was associated with severe short-term postoperative pain but less postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRoboticsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaCoughHumansPneumonectomyPropensity ScoreProspective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedPostoperative rehabilitationPropensity score-matched analysisRobot-assisted thoracic surgeryUniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38105381
PMCPMC10908624
OpenAlexW4389862757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.