Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38105229›Full record

ArticleCommunity health equity research & policy2025

Extending Kingdon's Multiple Streams Policy Framework Through an Analysis of How Community Health Workers in India Are Driving Policy Changes.

Sanjana Santosh, Sumit Kane

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community health equity research & policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanjana SantoshCentre for Health Policy and Systems, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5486-8441
Sumit KaneCentre for Health Policy and Systems, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-7344
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics · INThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we develop and provide a novel account of the process through which the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), a cadre of seemingly powerless community health workers in India, are navigating a complex policy process to incrementally achieve their goals. ASHAs have been demanding better working conditions, better compensation, and regularisation as public service employees through protests and strikes and have managed to gain concessions from both the Central and various State governments. We observed two important aspects that emerged: (a) ASHAs achieved incremental increases in their wages despite being the lowest in the health system hierarchy, and, (b) major gains were made during the 2 years of the pandemic. We examine and analyse ASHAs' engagement and strategies used, both overt and covert, sometimes with the government, and the role of other actors in determining these policy outcomes. We do so by drawing on academic literature and news media reports; we trace the changes in ASHAs' wages by tying together key events, 'windows of opportunity', and actions of 'policy entrepreneurs' involved in the process.In doing so, we further develop and propose an extension to Kingdon's multiple streams policy framework through the addition of a 'narrative stream'.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersHealth PolicyPolicy MakingCOVID-19HumansIndiaSalaries and Fringe Benefitsaccredited social health activistscommunity health workersCOVID-19health policy changeIndiamultiple streams framework

Identifiers

PMID38105229
PMCPMC11863506
OpenAlexW4389871075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.