Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38104961›Full record

ReviewChest2024

Outcomes and Management After COVID-19 Critical Illness.

Leigh Cagino, Katharine Seagly, Emily Noyes, Hallie Prescott, Thomas Valley, Tammy Eaton, Jakob I McSparron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coping with COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit admission.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leigh CaginoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: caginol@med.umich.edu.
Katharine SeaglyDivision of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Emily NoyesDivision of Rehabilitation Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Hallie PrescottDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Thomas ValleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Tammy EatonDepartment of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI; VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jakob I McSparronDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

Promoting Equity via Change in Practice for Respiratory Failure (PRECIPICE)R01HL157361 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG-HOUGH, MARI, VALLEY, THOMAS SEBASTIAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
Preventing avoidable deaths from pneumonia by improving use of intensive careK23HL140165 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VALLEY, THOMAS SEBASTIAN · 2018 to 2022
$915k
Optimizing Veteran Recovery from Sepsis (OVeR-Sepsis)I01HX003304 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI PRESCOTT, HALLIE CHRISTINE, SUSSMAN, JEREMY BRODER · 2021 to 2025
–
AHRQ HHS R01 HS028038HSRD VA I01 HX003304NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL140165NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

topic importanceCOVID-19 has caused > 7 million deaths worldwide since its onset in 2019. Although the severity of illness has varied throughout the pandemic, critical illness related to COVID-19 persists. Survivors of COVID-19 critical illness can be left with sequelae of both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and long-term effects of critical illness included within post-intensive care syndrome. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of COVID-19 critical illness, the biopsychosocial-ecological model can aid in evaluation and treatment of survivors, integrating interactions among physical, cognitive, and psychological domains, as well as social systems and environments. REVIEW

findingsProlonged illness after COVID-19 critical illness generally can be classified into effects on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial function, with much interaction among the various effects, and includes a wide range of symptoms such as ICU-acquired weakness, prolonged respiratory symptoms, cognitive changes, post-traumatic stress disorder post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. Risk factors for COVID-19 critical illness developing are complex and include preexisting factors, disease course, and specifics of hospitalization in addition to psychological comorbidities and socioenvironmental factors. Recovery trajectories are not well defined, and management requires a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and individualized approach to care. SUMMARY: The onset of vaccinations, new therapeutics, and new strains of SARS-CoV-2 virus have decreased COVID-19 mortality; however, the number of survivors of COVID-19 critical illness remains high. A biopsychosocial-ecological approach is recommended to guide care of COVID-19 critical illness survivors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical IllnessCritical CareHumansSARS-CoV-2SurvivorsCOVID-19ICU survivorshippost-ICU

Identifiers

PMID38104961
PMCPMC11214908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.