Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38104601›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Cognitive and sensory expectations independently shape musical expectancy and pleasure.

Vincent K M Cheung, Peter M C Harrison, Stefan Koelsch, Marcus T Pearce, Angela D Friederici, Lars Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dissociating the neural codes for multiple pitch perception in humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cognitive and sensory expectations independently shape musical expectancy and pleasure.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Aesthetics and predictive processing: grounds and prospects of a fruitful encounter.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent K M CheungSony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc., Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-0022, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0349-4398
Peter M C HarrisonCentre for Music and Science, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Music, 11 West Road, Cambridge, CB3 9DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-9462
Stefan KoelschDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, 5009, Norway.
Marcus T PearceCentre for Digital Music, Queen Mary University of London, E1 4NS, UK.
Angela D FriedericiDepartment of Neuropsychology, Sony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc., Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-0022, Japan.
Lars MeyerResearch Group Language Cycles, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expectation is crucial for our enjoyment of music, yet the underlying generative mechanisms remain unclear. While sensory models derive predictions based on local acoustic information in the auditory signal, cognitive models assume abstract knowledge of music structure acquired over the long term. To evaluate these two contrasting mechanisms, we compared simulations from four computational models of musical expectancy against subjective expectancy and pleasantness ratings of over 1000 chords sampled from 739 US Billboard pop songs. Bayesian model comparison revealed that listeners' expectancy and pleasantness ratings were predicted by the independent, non-overlapping, contributions of cognitive and sensory expectations. Furthermore, cognitive expectations explained over twice the variance in listeners' perceived surprise compared to sensory expectations, suggesting a larger relative importance of long-term representations of music structure over short-term sensory-acoustic information in musical expectancy. Our results thus emphasize the distinct, albeit complementary, roles of cognitive and sensory expectations in shaping musical pleasure, and suggest that this expectancy-driven mechanism depends on musical information represented at different levels of abstraction along the neural hierarchy. This article is part of the theme issue 'Art, aesthetics and predictive processing: theoretical and empirical perspectives'.

Indexed as

MusicPleasureAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBayes TheoremCognitionMotivationcomputational modellingexpectancymusicpleasure and rewardpredictive codingtonal harmony

Identifiers

PMID38104601
PMCPMC10725761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.