Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38104599›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Aesthetics and predictive processing: grounds and prospects of a fruitful encounter.

Jacopo Frascaroli, Helmut Leder, Elvira Brattico, Sander Van de Cruys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacopo FrascaroliDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2517-7158
Helmut LederFaculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science Research Hub, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-3671
Elvira BratticoCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, and Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0676-6464
Sander Van de CruysAntwerp Social Lab, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4831-7800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few years, a remarkable convergence of interests and results has emerged between scholars interested in the arts and aesthetics from a variety of perspectives and cognitive scientists studying the mind and brain within the predictive processing (PP) framework. This convergence has so far proven fruitful for both sides: while PP is increasingly adopted as a framework for understanding aesthetic phenomena, the arts and aesthetics, examined under the lens of PP, are starting to be seen as important windows into our mental functioning. The result is a vast and fast-growing research programme that promises to deliver important insights into our aesthetic encounters as well as a wide range of psychological phenomena of general interest. Here, we present this developing research programme, describing its grounds and highlighting its prospects. We start by clarifying how the study of the arts and aesthetics encounters the PP picture of mental functioning (§1). We then go on to outline the prospects of this encounter for the fields involved: philosophy and history of art (§2), psychology of aesthetics and neuroaesthetics (§3) and psychology and neuroscience more generally (§4). The upshot is an ambitious but well-defined framework within which aesthetics and cognitive science can partner up to illuminate crucial aspects of the human mind. This article is part of the theme issue 'Art, aesthetics and predictive processing: theoretical and empirical perspectives'.

Indexed as

BrainNeurosciencesCognitive ScienceEstheticsHumansPhilosophyaestheticsaffectcognitive scienceinferencemeaning-makingpredictive processing

Identifiers

PMID38104599
PMCPMC10725766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.