ArticleScientific reports2023
Comparison of the accuracy of Japanese synonym identifications using word embeddings in the radiological technology field.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The terminology in radiological technology is crucial, encompassing a broad range of principles from radiation to medical imaging, and involving various specialists. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of automatic synonym detection considering the characteristics of the Japanese language by Word2vec and fastText in the radiological technology field for the terminology elaboration. We collected around 340 thousand abstracts in Japanese. First, preprocessing of the abstract data was performed. Then, training models were created with Word2vec and fastText with different architectures: continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) and skip-gram, and vector sizes. Baseline synonym sets were curated by two experts, utilizing terminology resources specific to radiological technology. A term in the dataset input into the generated models, and the top-10 synonym candidates which had high cosine similarities were obtained. Subsequently, precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy for each model were calculated. The fastText model with CBOW at 300 dimensions was most precise in synonym detection, excelling in cases with shared n-grams. Conversely, fastText with skip-gram and Word2vec were favored for synonyms without common n-grams. In radiological technology, where n-grams are prevalent, fastText with CBOW proved advantageous, while in informatics, characterized by abbreviations and transliterations, Word2vec with CBOW was more effective.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.