Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38104145›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A randomized controlled trial of a proactive analgesic protocol demonstrates reduced opioid use among hospitalized adults with inflammatory bowel disease.

Sameer K Berry, Will Takakura, Devin Patel, Rajalakshmi Govalan, Afsoon Ghafari, Elizabeth Kiefer, Shao-Chi Huang, Catherine Bresee, Teryl K Nuckols, Gil Y Melmed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03798405 (Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03798405 naterminatednot on this map

Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorCedars-Sinai Medical CenterRan2019 to 2022Enrolled33ConditionsInflammatory Bowel Diseases, Pain, Opioid Use, Crohn DiseaseArmsProactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sameer K BerryDepartment of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Will TakakuraDepartment of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Devin PatelDepartment of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Rajalakshmi GovalanDepartment of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Afsoon GhafariF. Widjaja Inflammatory Bowel Disease Institute, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Elizabeth KieferResearch Informatics and Scientific Computing Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Shao-Chi HuangResearch Informatics and Scientific Computing Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Catherine BreseeBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Teryl K NuckolsDepartment of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Gil Y MelmedF. Widjaja Inflammatory Bowel Disease Institute, Karsh Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. gil.melmed@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience pain. Despite the known risks associated with opioids in IBD including risk for misuse, overdose, infection, readmission, and even death, opioid use is more prevalent in IBD than any other chronic gastrointestinal condition. Most hospitalized IBD patients receive opioids; however, opioids have not been shown to improve pain during hospitalization. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in hospitalized patients with IBD to evaluate the impact of a proactive opioid-sparing analgesic protocol. Wearable devices measured activity and sleep throughout their hospitalization. Chronic opioid users, post-operative, and pregnant patients were excluded. The primary endpoint was a change in pain scores from admission to discharge. Secondary endpoints included opioid use, functional activity, sleep duration and quality, and length of stay. Of 329 adults with IBD evaluated for eligibility, 33 were enrolled and randomized to the intervention or usual care. Both the intervention and control group demonstrated significant decreases in pain scores from admission to discharge (- 2.6 ± 2.6 vs. - 3.0 ± 3.2). Those randomized to the intervention tended to have lower pain scores than the control group regardless of hospital day (3.02 ± 0.90 vs. 4.29 ± 0.81, p = 0.059), used significantly fewer opioids (daily MME 11.8 ± 15.3 vs. 30.9 ± 42.2, p = 0.027), and had a significantly higher step count by Day 4 (2330 ± 1709 vs. 1050 ± 1214; p = 0.014). There were no differences in sleep duration, sleep quality, readmission, or length-of-stay between the two groups. A proactive analgesic protocol does not result in worsening pain but does significantly reduce opioid-use in hospitalized IBD patients.Clinical trial registration number: NCT03798405 (Registered 10/01/2019).

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID38104145
PMCPMC10725490
OpenAlexW4389829224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.