Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38104112›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2023

Potential for reducing immobility times of a mobility monitor in-bed sensor system - a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.

Sven Ziegler, Claudia Schmoor, Lili M Schöler, Sam Schepputat, Eyere Takem, Birgit Grotejohann, Inga Steinbrenner, Johanna Feuchtinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sven ZieglerCenter of Implementing Nursing Care Innovations Freiburg, Nursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. sven.ziegler@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1932-0787
Claudia SchmoorClinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5610-9425
Lili M SchölerCenter of Implementing Nursing Care Innovations Freiburg, Nursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-3179
Sam SchepputatCenter of Implementing Nursing Care Innovations Freiburg, Nursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Eyere TakemClinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Birgit GrotejohannClinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Inga SteinbrennerClinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0851-5773
Johanna FeuchtingerCenter of Implementing Nursing Care Innovations Freiburg, Nursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPressure ulcer prophylaxis is a central topic in clinical care. Pressure-relieving repositioning is strongly recommended for all pressure-sensitive patients. The Mobility Monitor (MoMo) is a technical device that records a patient's movements and transmits the data to a monitor. This study investigated the extent to which the MoMo sensor system, which records and visualises patients' movements in bed, supports nurses in performing pressure-relieving repositioning in neurological and neurosurgical intensive care units (ICU).

methodsThis stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial involved two clusters: one neurological and one neurosurgical ICU. The study was carried out in two steps over three periods between November 2018 and May 2019, with a two-month interval between each step. At the beginning of the study, we equipped 33 beds across the two ICUs with a MoMo system. Our primary endpoint was the immobility rate, which is defined as the patient's inactive time in bed exceeding two hours without pressure-relieving movements divided by the time the MoMo was in the bed. The immobility rate ranges from 0 to below 1, with higher values indicating lower mobility. Secondary endpoints were the rate of new pressure ulcers and the rate of relevant pressure-relieving repositionings. Relevant repositionings are defined as the number of repositionings identified by the MoMo as a pressure-relieving repositioning divided by the total number of repositionings,

results808 patients were included in the study, of whom 403 were in the control group and 405 were in the intervention group. The mean immobility rate was 0.171 during the control phase and 0.144 during the intervention phase. The estimated intervention effect was -0.0018 (95% confidence interval [-0.0471, 0.0436], p=0.94). The number of new pressure ulcers was 5/405 in the intervention phase and 15/403 in the control phase. We noted a small difference in the mean rate of relevant repositioningswith an estimated intervention effect of 0.046 (95% confidence interval [-0.018, 0.110], p=0.16).

conclusionOur results are insufficient to recommend the standardised use of mobility monitors in neurological or neurosurgical ICUs. CLINICAL

trial registrationThe primary analysis was prespecified and the trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) under the reference number DRKS00015492 (31/10/2018).

Indexed as

Digital technologyIn-bed sensorMobility monitoringNursingPressure UlcerPreventionRepositioningStepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial

Identifiers

PMID38104112
PMCPMC10725577
OpenAlexW4389831633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.