ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Distal forearm squeeze test for the diagnosis of digital flexor tendon injuries.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tendon and ligament injuries of the finger and thumb in athletes: a narrative review.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe forearm/wrist squeeze/compression test has been used to examine digital flexor tendon injuries with varied names. Furthermore, the test has not been minutely described and its mechanism remains unclear. We renamed the test the "distal forearm squeeze test". The purpose of this study was to elaborate on the test and elucidate the mechanism.
methodsTwo patients with digital flexor tendons ruptured in zone 3 and zone 1 respectively and 50 outpatients with intact digital tendons underwent the test. Then the test was performed on 3 chickens under 4 conditions. First, when the digital flexor and extensor tendons were all intact. Second, after the flexor tendons of the third toe were transected. Third, after the flexor tendons of all toes of the foot were transected. Finally, after the flexor and extensor tendons of all toes of the foot were transected.
resultsIn the patient with digital flexor tendons ruptured in zone 3, the test showed that the injured digit was flexed slightly while the uninjured digits were flexed obviously. In the patient with digital flexor tendon ruptured in zone 1, after separate stabilization of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the injured and uninjured fingers in extension, the test showed that the distal interphalangeal joint of the patient's injured finger had no response, while those of the uninjured fingers were flexed. All 50 subjects showed clenched or half-clenched hands in response to the test. The test showed that all toes were flexed when the digital tendons of the chicken were intact. All toes were flexed except the third toe after the flexor tendons of the third toe were transected. All toes were extended after all the digital flexor tendons were transected. All toes had no response after all the digital flexor and extensor tendons were transected.
conclusionsThe distal forearm squeeze test is valuable in examining digital flexor tendon injuries. If only the flexor digitorum profundus tendon is examined, the PIP joint of the finger should be stabilized in extension during the test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.