Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38104075›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Evaluation of critical congenital heart disease from 2018 to 2020 in Turkey: a retrospective cohort study.

Nilgün Çaylan, Sıddika Songül Yalçın, Başak Tezel, Oben Üner, Şirin Aydin, Fatih Kara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Should Dual Pulse Oximetry Screening Be Used in Neonates? The Insights from the CHOOSE Study.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nilgün ÇaylanChild and Adolescent Health Department, Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Sıddika Songül YalçınDepartment of Social Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Institute of Child Health, Ankara, Turkey. siyalcin@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9061-4281
Başak TezelChild and Adolescent Health Department, Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Oben ÜnerChild and Adolescent Health Department, Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Şirin AydinChild and Adolescent Health Department, Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Public Health, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatih KaraDepartment of Public Health, Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.
Ministry of Health · TRHacettepe University · TRSelçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to examine the features of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD).

methodsThe study was planned as a retrospective cohort study. Data for the study were obtained through national data collection systems and 2018-2020 CCHD cohort was established. In this study, we divided the patients into two groups: Group 1 included seven primary target diseases of the newborn CCHD screening program and Group 2 included secondary target diseases.

resultsThere were 9884 CCHD cases, with a prevalence of 27.8 per 10,000 live births. Of the cases 44.4% were in Group 1 (12.3 per 10,000) and 54.8% were in Group 2 (15.2 per 10,000). Of all cases 55.5% were male and the female/male ratio was 1/1.2. While 21.8% of the cases were premature, 23.0% were babies with low birth weight (LBW), 4.8% were born from multiple pregnancies. The highest prevalence of CCHD was found in LBW (84.8 per 10,000), premature infants (57.8 per 10,000) (p < 0.001). The fatality rate in the cohort was 16.6% in the neonatal period, 31.6% in the first year of life respectively. The mean estimated survival time in the birth cohort was 40.0 months (95% CI: 39.5-40.6). The mean survival time for Group 1 diseases was 33.4 months (95% CI: 32.5-34.2), while it was 45.4 months (95% CI: 44.7-46.0) for Group 2 diseases (p < 0.001). Preterm birth, LBW, maternal age and region were evaluated as factors associated with mortality risk.

conclusionThis study showed that CCHDs are common in Turkey and mortality rates are high. There are regional differences in CCHD both prevalence and survival. Improving prenatal diagnosis rates and expanding neonatal CCHD screening are of key importance.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTurkeyBirth cohortCase fatalityCritical congenital Heart Disease (CCHD)Newborn screeningPrevalenceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID38104075
PMCPMC10724899
OpenAlexW4389828598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.