Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38104074›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Technology for dementia care: what would good technology look like and do, from carers' perspectives?

Ruth Brookman, Simon Parker, Leonard Hoon, Asuka Ono, Atsushi Fukayama, Hisashi Matsukawa, Celia B Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anomaly Detection Technologies for Dementia Care: Monitoring Goals, Sensor Applications, and Trade-offs in Home-Based Solutions-A Narrative Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruth Brookman *MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia. ruth.brookman@westernsydney.edu.au.
Simon ParkerDeakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Leonard HoonDeakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Asuka OnoNippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT), Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi FukayamaNippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT), Tokyo, Japan.
Hisashi MatsukawaNippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT), Tokyo, Japan.
Celia B Harris *MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of technology in dementia care has largely been without consultation with carers, and has primarily focused on safety, monitoring devices, and supporting activities of daily living. Further, while involving end-users in the design of technology has been recommended, this is yet to become common practice.

methodWe conducted a mixed methods study with the aim of investigating carers' values and priorities for technology development, including prior experiences, barriers to use, and what they would like technology to do. Importantly, we asked carers for their design ideas and bespoke technology solutions for future development.

resultsCarers of people living with dementia (N = 127), including both unpaid (n = 102) and paid carers (n = 25) residing in Australia, completed an online survey. In addition, a subsample of carers (n = 23) participated in semi-structured interviews. Findings demonstrate that carers want technology to be person-centred, customisable, and to increase opportunities for meaningful social connection. Findings also demonstrate the ability of carers to generate creative design solutions for dementia care.

conclusionsThese findings and implications will be discussed in relation to the importance of co-design with carers and engineers during the design phase of assistive technology. Also, the importance of technology to enhance, not replace, human-to-human social interactions is highlighted.

Indexed as

DementiaSelf-Help DevicesActivities of Daily LivingCaregiversHumansTechnologyAssistive technologyCarersDementia careSocial engagementTechnology design ideasUnmet needs

Identifiers

PMID38104074
PMCPMC10725604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.