Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38103161›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2024

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Two-Component SARS-CoV-2 Protein Vaccine: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase I and Phase II Studies.

Chris Wynne, Abundio Balgos, Jingxin Li, Paul Hamilton, Louie Tirador, Anjuli May Jaen, Chen Mo, Zijing Yue, Ying Ma, Qingshuang Wang and 9 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04818801 early_phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, First-in-human, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of ReCOV, a Vaccine for COVID-19, in Healthy Adult Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiangsu Rec-Biotechnology Co., Ltd.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsCovid19ArmsRecombinant two-component COVID-19 vaccine (CHO cell), Placebo
NCT05084989 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Blinded, Two-part, Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of the Recombinant Two-component COVID-19 Vaccine (CHO Cell) in Adults 18 Years and Older

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiangsu Rec-Biotechnology Co., Ltd.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled948ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsPart1:Recombinant two-component COVID-19 vaccine (CHO cell), Part1: Placebo, Part2: Recombinant two-component COVID-19 vaccine (CHO cell), Part2: COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chris Wynne *New Zealand Clinical Research, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Abundio Balgos *Philippines Clinical Research, The Health Centrum, Roxas City, Philippines.
Jingxin Li *NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, China.
Paul HamiltonNew Zealand Clinical Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
Louie TiradorPhilippines Clinical Research, St. Paul's Hospital, Iloilo City, Philippines.
Anjuli May JaenPhilippines Clinical Research, The Medical City Iloilo, Iloilo City, Philippines.
Chen MoJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Zijing YueJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Ying MaJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Qingshuang WangJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Rendu WenJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Zheng YaoJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Jiaping YuJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Wenrong YaoJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Jianhui ZhangJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Hui ZhengSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Kunxue HongJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.
Fengcai ZhuNHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, China. jszfc@vip.sina.com.
Yong LiuJiangsu Recbio Technology Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China. liuy@recbio.cn.
Southeast University · CNClinical Trials New Zealand · NZJiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSaint Paul’s Hospital Iloilo · PHUniversity of Iloilo · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReCOV is a recombinant protein vaccine that aims to induce cross-neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 variants. The phase I and phase II studies were conducted in New Zealand and the Philippines, respectively, for ReCOV primary series.

methodsBoth studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled designed among COVID-19 vaccine-naïve healthy adults who received two doses of study vaccination with a 21-day interval. In phase I, 100 younger (15-55 years) and older (56-80 years) subjects were 4:1 randomized to receive ReCOV (20 µg or 40 µg) or placebo. In the phase II study, 347 subjects (≥ 18 years) were 2:1 randomized to receive 40 µg ReCOV or placebo. Subjects that received ReCOV were followed up for 6 months after the second dosing. The safety outcomes included solicited and unsolicited AEs, SAEs, and AESIs. The immunogenicity outcomes were live-virus neutralizing antibody (NAb) against prototype, while pseudovirus NAbs against several SARS-CoV-2 variants were included in phase II as well.

resultsNo related SAE, AESI, or AE leading to early discontinuation were reported. The AE incidences were higher in ReCOV groups than placebo group in phase I while they were similar between study groups in phase II. The majority of solicited AEs were mild or moderate with median duration of 1.0-4.0 days. The common (≥ 10%) solicited AEs in phase I were injection site reactions, headache, pyrexia, fatigue, and myalgia, and common reported (≥ 5%) ones in phase II included injection site pain, headache, and pyrexia. Robust neutralizing activities against the prototype were observed in ReCOV groups, peaking at 14 days post the second dosing: in phase I, the GMTs for 20 μg and 40 μg ReCOV groups were 1643.2 IU/mL (95% CI 1188.5, 2271.9) and 1289.2 IU/mL (95% CI 868.3, 1914.1) in younger adults, and 1122.3 IU/mL (95% CI 722.6, 1743.1) and 680.3 IU/mL (95% CI 440.2, 1051.4) in older adults, respectively, while in the ReCOV group of phase II, the GMTs for subjects with seronegative and seropositive status at baseline were 3741.0 IU/mL (95% CI 3113.4, 4495.0) and 6138.3 IU/mL (95% CI 5255.1, 7169.9), respectively. In phase II, substantial levels of pseudovirus NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 variants were demonstrated; the peak GMTs for prototype, Omicron BA.2, and BA.4/5 were 8857, 4441, and 2644, and 15,667.3, 7334.3, and 4478.8 among seronegative and seropositive subjects, respectively. The neutralization persisted till 6 months post the second dosing, with only 2.5- to 5.2-fold declines for Omicron variants.

conclusionsTwo doses of 20 µg and 40 µg ReCOV are safe and immunogenic against SARS-CoV-2 prototype. The cross-neutralizing activities against Omicron variants support ReCOV advance to late-stage clinical trials.

trial registrationPhase I study, clinicaltrials.gov NCT04818801; phase II study, clinicaltrials.gov NCT05084989.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsOmicronRecombinant two-component SARS-CoV-2 protein vaccineReCOVSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38103161
PMCPMC10828165
OpenAlexW4389832214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.